Validating the wheelchair outcome measure for residents in long-term care

被引:2
作者
Parvaneh, Shahriar [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Mortenson, William B. [4 ,6 ]
Miller, William C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Program Rehabil Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] GF Strong Rehabil Res Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Int Collaborat Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, T325-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[5] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Tehran, Iran
[6] Simon Fraser Univ, Gerontol Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Mobility; nursing homes; participation; validation studies; wheelchairs;
D O I
10.3109/17483107.2013.769126
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the retest reliability and construct validity of the self-report and proxy versions of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) among residents in long-term care. Method: The WhOM was administered to 55 wheelchair users living in residential care (38 self-respondents and 17 proxy respondents). Retest data were collected to estimate reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for each of the tool scores (Importance, Satisfaction and Importance x Satisfaction). For construct validity testing, Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess whether WhOM scores were correlated with scores from the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLDI) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Results: The ICCs for the WhOM scores were between 0.68 and 0.84. Moderate correlations were found between the self-respondents and proxy respondents groups with Importance x Satisfaction and LLDI (r = 0.46-0.50). No other significant correlations were found. Conclusions: This study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the WhOM for adults in residential care, but further testing is warranted to ensure it can facilitate prescription of the right device at the right time for residents in these settings.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 212
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[2]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION OF THE WHEELCHAIR OUTCOME MEASURE FOR MIDDLE-AGED AND OLDER USERS OF POWER MOBILITY DEVICES [J].
Auger, Claudine ;
Demers, Louise ;
Gelinas, Isabelle ;
Routhier, Francois ;
Ben Mortenson, W. ;
Miller, William C. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (06) :574-581
[3]   Predictors of Mobility Among Wheelchair Using Residents in Long-Term Care [J].
Ben Mortenson, W. ;
Miller, William C. ;
Backman, Catherine L. ;
Oliffe, John L. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (10) :1587-1593
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users [J].
Brienza, DM ;
Karg, PE ;
Geyer, MJ ;
Kelsey, S ;
Trefler, E .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (04) :529-533
[6]   The Use of Mobility Devices Among Institutionalized Older Adults [J].
Clarke, Philippa ;
Chan, Pamela ;
Santaguida, P. Lina ;
Colantonio, Angela .
JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2009, 21 (04) :611-626
[7]   SCREENING, DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPRESSION IN ELDERLY PRIMARY-CARE ATTENDERS .1. THE ACCEPTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE 15-ITEM GERIATRIC DEPRESSION SCALE (GDS15) AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHORT VERSIONS [J].
DATH, P ;
KATONA, P ;
MULLAN, E ;
EVANS, S ;
CORNELIUS, K .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 11 (03) :260-266
[8]   Psychometric properties of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in functionally impaired, cognitively intact, community-dwelling elderly primary care patients [J].
Friedman, B ;
Heisel, MJ ;
Delavan, RL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (09) :1570-1576
[9]   Wheelchair use by residents of nursing homes: Effectiveness in meeting positioning and mobility needs [J].
Fuchs, RH ;
Gromak, TA .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 15 (02) :151-163
[10]   WHY NURSING-HOMES DO WHAT THEY DO [J].
GOTTESMAN, LE ;
BOURESTOM, NC .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1974, 14 (06) :501-506