What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care

被引:32
作者
Corbett, Lisa Q. [1 ]
Ennis, William J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hartford Healthcare Inc, Hartford Hosp, Wound Healing Surg, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102 USA
[2] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Sect Wound Healing & Tissue Repair, Surg Clin, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/wound.2013.0458
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Patient preferences are statements made or actions taken by consumers that reflect their desirability of a range of health options. The concept occupies an increasingly prominent place at the center of healthcare reform, and is connected to all aspects of healthcare, including discovery, research, delivery, outcome, and payment. Patient preference research has focused on shared decisions, decisional aids, and clinical practice guideline development, with limited study in acute and chronic wound care populations. The wound care community has focused primarily on patient focused symptoms and quality of life measurement. With increasing recognition of wound care as a medical specialty and as a public health concern that consumes extensive resources, attention to the preferences of end-users with wounds is necessary. This article will provide an overview of related patient-centered concepts and begin to establish a framework for consideration of patient preference in wound care.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 543
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas [J].
Abma, Tineke A. ;
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2010, 13 (02) :160-173
[2]   Patient empowerment: Myths and misconceptions [J].
Anderson, Robert M. ;
Funnell, Martha M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 79 (03) :277-282
[3]   Patient preference and the impact of decision-making aids on prostate cancer treatment choices and post-intervention regret [J].
Aning, J. J. ;
Wassersug, R. J. ;
Goldenberg, S. L. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 :S37-S44
[4]   Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework [J].
Atkinson, AJ ;
Colburn, WA ;
DeGruttola, VG ;
DeMets, DL ;
Downing, GJ ;
Hoth, DF ;
Oates, JA ;
Peck, CC ;
Schooley, RT ;
Spilker, BA ;
Woodcock, J ;
Zeger, SL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (03) :89-95
[5]   Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology [J].
Brennan, PF ;
Strombom, I .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1998, 5 (03) :257-262
[6]   Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research [J].
Callard, Felicity ;
Rose, Diana ;
Wykes, Til .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2012, 15 (04) :389-400
[7]   Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review [J].
Chewning, Betty ;
Bylund, Carma L. ;
Shah, Bupendra ;
Arora, Neeraj K. ;
Gueguen, Jennifer A. ;
Makoul, Gregory .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 86 (01) :9-18
[8]   How Well Do Guidelines Incorporate Evidence on Patient Preferences? [J].
Chong, Christopher ;
Chen, Ing-je ;
Naglie, Gary ;
Krahn, Murray D. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (08) :977-982
[9]   Individualized Guidelines: The Potential for Increasing Quality and Reducing Costs [J].
Eddy, David M. ;
Adler, Joshua ;
Patterson, Bradley ;
Lucas, Don ;
Smith, Kurt A. ;
Morris, Macdonald .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (09) :627-634
[10]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419