Expanding Language Expectancy Theory: The Suasory Effects of Lexical Complexity and Syntactic Complexity on Effective Message Design

被引:41
作者
Averbeck, Joshua M. [1 ]
Miller, Claude [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Illinois Univ, Dept Commun, 1 Univ Circle, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Commun, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
Cognitive Complexity; Language; Message Complexity; Message Processing; Persuasion;
D O I
10.1080/10510974.2013.775955
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This research uses language expectancy theory (LET; Burgoon, Jones, & Stewart, 1975; Miller & Burgoon, 1979) to explore message design effectiveness as a function of syntactic and lexical complexity, in a 2 (lexical: simple vs. complex) x 2 (syntactic: simple vs. complex) design. Pilot test and main study findings indicate optimal message features include the use of lexically simple language combined with syntactically simple sentence structure for receivers who are more likely to think on concrete as opposed to abstract levels, since such an arrangement makes integration of new information easier. Future directions are discussed for message design and for advancement of the theoretical contributions offered by examining syntactic complexity and lexical complexity within the explanatory framework of LET.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 95
页数:24
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Anderson R. C., 1988, LINGUISTIC COMPLEXIT, P23, DOI DOI 10.2307/415234
[2]   Irony and Language Expectancy Theory: Evaluations of Expectancy Violation Outcomes [J].
Averbeck, Joshua M. .
COMMUNICATION STUDIES, 2010, 61 (03) :356-372
[3]   Ironic Message Production: How and Why We Produce Ironic Messages [J].
Averbeck, Joshua M. ;
Hample, Dale .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2008, 75 (04) :396-410
[4]  
Bagdasarov Z., 2009, THESIS RUTGERS U NEW
[5]   AN INDEX TO MEASURE CONTINGENCY OF ENGLISH-SENTENCES [J].
BECKER, SW ;
BAVELAS, A ;
BRADEN, M .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1961, 4 (03) :139-145
[6]   Comprehension strategy use during peep-led discussions of text: Ninth graders tackle "The Lottery" [J].
Berne, Jennifer I. ;
Clark, Kathleen F. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2006, 49 (08) :674-686
[7]  
Brabham EG, 2002, READ TEACH, V55, P438
[8]  
Bradac J.J., 1979, HUMAN COMMUNICATION, V5, P257, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00639.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2958.1979.TB00639.X]
[9]   DIVERSITY AND DENSITY - LEXICALLY DETERMINED EVALUATIVE AND INFORMATIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY [J].
BRADAC, JJ ;
DESMOND, RJ ;
MURDOCK, JI .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1977, 44 (04) :273-283
[10]  
Burgoon, 2018, RECENT ADV LANGUAGE, P199