Vaginal Vault Prolapse

被引:33
作者
Uzoma, Azubuike [1 ]
Farag, K. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Barnsley Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, Gawber Rd, Barnsley S75 2EP, England
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2009/275621
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction. Vaginal vault prolapse is a common complication following vaginal hysterectomy with negative impact on women's quality of life due to associated urinary, anorectal and sexual dysfunction. A clear understanding of the supporting mechanism for the uterus and vagina is important in making the right choice of corrective procedure. Management should be individualised, taking into consideration the surgeon's experience, patients age, comorbidities, previous surgery and sex life. Result. Preexisting pelvic floor defect prior to hysterectomy is the single most important risk factor for vault prolapse. Various surgical techniques have been advanced at hysterectomy to prevent vault prolapse. Studies have shown the McCall's culdoplasty under direct visualisation to be superior. Vault prolapse repair rely on either the use of patient's tissue or synthetic materials and can be carried out abdominally or vaginally. Sacrospinous fixation and abdominal sacrocolpopexy are the commonly performed procedures, with literature in favour of abdominal sacrocolpopexy over sacrospinous fixation due to its reported higher success rate of about 90%. Other less commonly performed procedures include uterosacral ligament suspension and illiococcygeal fixation, both of which are equally effective, with the former having a high risk of ureteric injury. Colpoclesis will play a greater role in the future as the aging population increases. Mesh procedures are gaining in popularity, and preliminary data from vaginal mesh procedures is encouraging. Laparoscopic techniques require a high level of skill and experience. There aremany controversies on themechanism of prolapse and management techniques, which we have tried to address in this article. Conclusion. As the aging population increases, the incidence of prolapse will also rise, older techniques using native tissue will continue, while new techniques using the mesh needs to be studied further. The later may well be the way forward in future. Copyright (C) 2009 A. Uzoma and K.A. Farag.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Abrams P, 2002, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V21, P167, DOI 10.1002/nau.10052
[2]  
Addison WA, 1996, J GYNECOL TECH, V2, P69
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GREEN TOP GUID, V46
[4]   Vaginal vault prolapse: Choice of operation [J].
Arbel, R ;
Lavy, Y .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :959-977
[5]  
Bai SW, 2002, J REPROD MED, V47, P231
[6]   Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Barber, MD ;
Visco, AG ;
Weidner, AC ;
Amundsen, CL ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) :1402-1410
[7]  
BENSON JT, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P387
[8]   Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation [J].
Benson, JT ;
Lucente, V ;
McClellan, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1418-1421
[9]  
Carey M. P., 2003, AUSTRALIAN NZ CONTIN, V9, P37
[10]  
Carter J E, 2001, JSLS, V5, P29