Environmental Conflict Resolution: Evaluating Performance Outcomes and Contributing Factors

被引:62
作者
Emerson, Kirk [1 ]
Orr, Patricia J. [2 ]
Keyes, Dale L. [2 ]
McKnight, Katherine M.
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] US Inst Environm Conflict Resolut, Evaluat, Abbott Pk, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/crq.247
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This empirical study of fifty-two environmental conflict resolution (ECR) processes is based on an evaluation framework that specifies key conditions and factors that contribute to ECR outcomes. Data were collected on a range of ECR processes and applications. This article reports on findings from a multilevel modeling analysis that focuses on three primary outcomes: reaching agreement, the quality of agreement, and improved working relationships among parties. Effective engagement of parties is identified as a major contributor to all three outcomes. Other key factors that operate directly and indirectly through effective engagement are involvement of appropriate parties, the skills and practices of ECR mediators and facilitators, and incorporation of relevant and high-quality information. Findings generally support the ECR evaluation framework.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 64
页数:38
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Andrew JS, 2001, J PLAN EDUC RES, V21, P166, DOI 10.1177/073945601128993148
[2]  
Armbruster A., 2008, COLLABORATIVE VERSUS
[3]  
Army D., 1987, POLITICS ENV MEDIATI
[4]  
ARNOLD CL, 1992, MEAS EVAL COUNS DEV, V25, P58
[5]  
Beierle T.C., 2002, DEMOCRACY PRACTICE P
[6]  
Berry F., 2003, PROMISE ENV CONFLICT
[7]  
Berry F., 2001, SYR U C EV ENV PUBL
[8]  
Bingham G., 1986, RESOLVING ENV DISPUT
[9]  
Bingham LisaB., 2003, PROMISE PERFORMANCE, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781936331741
[10]  
Buckle L. G., 1986, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V6, P55