EFFECTS OF A PROGRAM TO TRAIN RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS TO IDENTIFY ABNORMALITIES ON MAMMOGRAMS

被引:18
作者
BASSETT, LW
HOLLATZBROWN, AJ
BASTANI, R
PEARCE, JG
HIRJI, K
CHEN, L
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH MED,JONSSON COMPREHENS CANC CTR,LOS ANGELES,CA
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH PUBL HLTH,LOS ANGELES,CA
[3] UNIV SO CALIF,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,LOS ANGELES,CA
关键词
BREAST RADIOGRAPHY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGISTS; TECHNOLOGISTS;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997550
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess whether radiologic technologists could be successfully trained to identify abnormalities on mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight radiologic technologists from two different institutions took a pretest, underwent an 8-hour training course followed by a period of preceptorship, and then took a posttest. Seven radiologists also took the pretest and posttest, which consisted of evaluating 1,238 two-view screening examinations, including 318 biopsy-proved cancers. RESULTS: Overall, technologists at institution 1 had lower sensitivity (78%) at the pretest, which improved at the posttest (90%). Technologists at institution 2 had lower specificity at the pretest (44%), which improved on the posttest (64%). Hypothetical pairing of radiologists and technologists with use of posttest results revealed an increase in sensitivity (median increase, 12% at institution 1 and 19% at institution 2). CONCLUSION: Formalized training successfully modified the technologists' skills. Radiologic technologists could be used to increase the number of breast cancers detected at screening mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 192
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] PROTOCOL AND RESULTS OF TRAINING NONRADIOLOGISTS TO SCAN MAMMOGRAMS
    ALCORN, FS
    ODONNELL, E
    ACKERMAN, LV
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1971, 99 (03) : 523 - &
  • [2] PRESENT STATUS OF RESIDENCY TRAINING IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    BASSETT, LW
    CASSADY, CI
    GOLD, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (01) : 59 - 62
  • [3] WHAT ARE THE ISSUES IN THE DOUBLE READING OF MAMMOGRAMS
    BEAM, CA
    SULLIVAN, DC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) : 582 - 582
  • [4] BIRD RE, 1993, APPL RADIOL, V22, P72
  • [5] MAMMOGRAM INTERPRETATION BY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS
    DEWAARD, F
    COLLETTE, HJA
    ROMBACH, JJ
    BEIJERINCK, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 150 (05) : 1201 - 1202
  • [6] DODD G D, 1987, Cancer, V60, P1671, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19871001)60:1+<1671::AID-CNCR2820601203>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-2
  • [8] LAY SCREENERS IN MAMMOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROGRAMS
    DOWDY, AH
    LAGASSE, LD
    ROACH, P
    WILSON, D
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1970, 95 (03) : 619 - &
  • [9] SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    HALL, FM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (01) : 195 - 197
  • [10] MAMMOGRAM INTERPRETATION BY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS
    HILLMAN, BJ
    FAJARDO, LL
    HUNTER, TB
    MOCKBEE, B
    COOK, CE
    HAGAMAN, RM
    BJELLAND, JC
    FREY, CS
    HARRIS, CJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (05) : 907 - 911