Welfare quality applied to the Brazilian dairy cattle

被引:10
|
作者
Franchi, Guilherme Amorim [1 ]
Garcia, Paulo Rogerio [1 ]
Oliveira da Silva, Iran Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Biosyst Engn, Anim Environm Res Nucl, Padua Dias Ave,11,POB 9, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, Brazil
来源
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND BIOMETEOROLOGY | 2014年 / 2卷 / 02期
关键词
Brazil; dairy; evaluation; welfare;
D O I
10.14269/2318-1265.v02n02a04
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Due to the necessity of establishing animal welfare standards for the Brazilian dairy sector in harmony to the new consumer's requirements and legislation, it was drawn up the project Welfare Quality (WQ) - Brazil, based on the proposed project Welfare Quality (R) European Union for dairy cattle. The assessments of animal welfare were performed in seven dairy farms at Sao Paulo/Brazil. They were selected in order to represent the main types of dairy farms found in Brazil. To carry out the project, it was used the evaluation protocol of welfare in Dairy Cattle Welfare Quality (R) Assessment Protocol for Cattle, which is based on the principles of Good Feeding, Proper Installation, Good Health and Appropriate Behavior. The protocol defines four possible categories for the assessed dairy farms: Not classified, Acceptable, Enhanced or Excellent. Only one farm received category "Acceptable", while the others received category "Enhanced". A highlight is the unsatisfactory score for the principle "Appropriate Behavior" received by four farms. Possible reasons are inappropriate animals handling, assessor subjectivity and/or protocol's subjectivity. To this final point, some emotion standards are vague and do not describe how animals should behave for each type of situation during evaluation. Finally, it can be concluded that the European protocol for the Evaluation of Welfare in Dairy Cattle Welfare Quality (R) may be used in Brazilian dairy farms provided there is previous assessor training and adaptation of some points to be feasible to Brazilian dairy sector.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing welfare quality in Hungarian dairy cattle herds
    Jurkovich Viktor
    Foris Borbala
    Vegh Akos
    Kovacs Peter
    Koenyves Laszlo
    Brydl Endre
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 2012, 134 (10) : 605 - 613
  • [2] Assessment time of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle
    de Vries, M.
    Engel, B.
    den Uijl, I.
    van Schaik, G.
    Dijkstra, T.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013, 22 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [3] Dairy cattle welfare
    Tadich, Nestor
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2011, 24 (03) : 293 - 300
  • [4] Assessment of animal welfare in dairy cattle farming - Evaluation of the Welfare Quality® Protocol
    Gieseke, D.
    Lambertz, C.
    Traulsen, Imke
    Krieter, J.
    Gauly, M.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2014, 86 (01): : 58 - 70
  • [5] Brazilian Citizens: Expectations Regarding Dairy Cattle Welfare and Awareness of Contentious Practices
    Cardoso, Clarissa S.
    von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
    Hotzel, Maria Jose
    ANIMALS, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [6] Dairy cattle welfare workshop
    Main, DCJ
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2003, 153 (07) : 220 - 220
  • [7] Longevity as an Animal Welfare Issue Applied to the Case of Foot Disorders in Dairy Cattle
    M. R. N. Bruijnis
    F. L. B. Meijboom
    E. N. Stassen
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2013, 26 : 191 - 205
  • [8] Longevity as an Animal Welfare Issue Applied to the Case of Foot Disorders in Dairy Cattle
    Bruijnis, M. R. N.
    Meijboom, F. L. B.
    Stassen, E. N.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2013, 26 (01): : 191 - 205
  • [9] CATTLE WELFARE Claw trimming of dairy cattle
    Burnell, Mark
    Reader, Jon
    Alcock, Phil
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2015, 177 (16)
  • [10] Sensitivity of the integrated Welfare Quality® scores to changing values of individual dairy cattle welfare measures
    de Graaf, S.
    Ampe, B.
    Buijs, S.
    Andreasen, S. N.
    Des Roches, A. De Boyer
    Van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M.
    Haskell, M. J.
    Kirchner, M. K.
    Mounier, L.
    Radeski, M.
    Winkler, C.
    Bijttebier, J.
    Lauwers, L.
    Verbeke, W.
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2018, 27 (02) : 157 - 166