Use of clinical MRI maximum intensity projections for improved breast lesion classification with deep convolutional neural networks

被引:75
作者
Antropova, Natalia [1 ]
Abe, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
convolutional neural networks; breast cancer; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; four-dimensional data; maximum intensity projection;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.014503
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Deep learning methods have been shown to improve breast cancer diagnostic and prognostic decisions based on selected slices of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). However, incorporation of volumetric and temporal components into DCE-MRIs has not been well studied. We propose maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of subtraction MRI as a way to simultaneously include four-dimensional (4-D) images into lesion classification using convolutional neural networks (CNN). The study was performed on a dataset of 690 cases. Regions of interest were selected around each lesion on three MRI presentations: (i) the MIP image generated on the second postcontrast subtraction MRI, (ii) the central slice of the second postcontrast MRI, and (iii) the central slice of the second postcontrast subtraction MRI. CNN features were extracted from the ROIs using pretrained VGGNet. The features were utilized in the training of three support vector machine classifiers to characterize lesions as malignant or benign. Classifier performances were evaluated with fivefold cross-validation and compared based on area under the ROC curve (AUC). The approach using MIPs [AUC = 0.88 (se = 0.01)] outperformed that using central-slices of either second postcontrast MRIs [0.80(se = 0.02)] or second postcontrast subtraction MRIs [AUC = 0.84(se = 0.02)], at statistically significant levels. (c) 2018 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, 2015, BREAST CANC FACTS FI
  • [2] Andrew Zisserman, 2015, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1409.1556
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, MAXIMUM INTENSITY PR
  • [4] A deep feature fusion methodology for breast cancer diagnosis demonstrated on three imaging modality datasets
    Antropova, Natalia
    Huynh, Benjamin Q.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (10) : 5162 - 5171
  • [5] Deep learning with non-medical training used for chest pathology identification
    Bar, Yaniv
    Diamant, Idit
    Wolf, Lior
    Greenspan, Hayit
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9414
  • [6] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [7] Deza Michel Marie, 2009, ENCY DISTANCES, P1
  • [8] Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
    Esteva, Andre
    Kuprel, Brett
    Novoa, Roberto A.
    Ko, Justin
    Swetter, Susan M.
    Blau, Helen M.
    Thrun, Sebastian
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 542 (7639) : 115 - +
  • [9] Anniversary Paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: The role of Medical Physics and AAPM
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Boone, John
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5799 - 5820
  • [10] Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique
    Greenspan, Hayit
    van Ginneken, Bram
    Summers, Ronald M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 35 (05) : 1153 - 1159