A STUDY OF BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK AS A PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR IN PATIENTS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

被引:0
作者
Sandhu, Pashaura Singh [1 ]
Kharbanda, Rajat [1 ]
Dhanju, Avtar Singh [1 ]
Sikri, Tejinder [1 ]
Singh, Lagbir [1 ]
Bansal, Tarun [2 ]
Wani, Saleem Altaf [3 ]
Kumar, Sahil [1 ]
机构
[1] GMC, Dept Med, Amritsar, Punjab, India
[2] BJMC, Dept Cardiol, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[3] ESI PGIMSR, Dept Anaesthesiol, New Delhi, India
来源
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2018年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Acute Myocardial Infarction; Bundle Branch Block; Arrhythmia; Mortality;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2018/129
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an event of myocardial necrosis caused by an unstable ischaemic syndrome, appearance of LBBB or RBBB in patients presenting with myocardial infarction predicts adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes compared to patients without bundle branch block. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a case control observational study. We prospectively studied the clinical, laboratorial, electrocardiographical and two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters of around 60 patients including 30 patients of myocardial infarction with bundle branch block (Group A) and 30 patients of myocardial infarction without bundle branch block (Group B) at Government Medical College and Hospital, Amritsar. For statistical significance, the "p value" was calculated and a value < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS Mean CPK MB (U/L) in patients of AMI with BBB (Group A) was 255.56 +/- 56 and in patients of AMI without BBB (Group B) was 175 +/- 13.59. In Group A 4 (13.33%), 8 (33.33%), 10 (33.33%) and 8 (26.66%) presented in Killip class 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. In Group B 10 (33.33%), 12 (40%), 6 (20%) and 2 (6.66%) were in Killip class 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. 2D echocardiography revealed that in Group A 21 (70%) patients had regional wall abnormality and 9 (30%) patients in Group B had regional wall motion abnormality. Mortality in Group A was 9 (21%) patients as compared to 2 (6.66%) patients in Group B. CONCLUSION AMI with bundle branch blocks is associated with more in-hospital morbidity and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 570
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Altalhi HK, 2017, JMSCR, V05, P19641
[2]   Acute Myocardial Infarction [J].
Anderson, Jeffrey L. ;
Morrow, David A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (21) :2053-2064
[3]  
Bhardwaj Rajeev, 2016, J Assoc Physicians India, V64, P36
[4]   Bundle branch block as a predictor of long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction [J].
Brilakis, ES ;
Wright, RS ;
Kopecky, SL ;
Reeder, GS ;
Williams, BA ;
Miller, WL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (03) :205-209
[5]  
Daniela T., 1996, ROM J INTERN MED, V34, P211
[6]   Natural history of isolated bundle branch block [J].
Fahy, GJ ;
Pinski, SL ;
Miller, DP ;
McCabe, N ;
Pye, C ;
Walsh, MJ ;
Robinson, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 77 (14) :1185-1190
[7]   Old age, left bundle branch block and acute myocardial infarction: A vexing and lethal combination [J].
Friesinger, GC ;
Smith, RF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :713-716
[8]   Ischaemic heart disease presenting as arrhythmias [J].
Ghuran, AV ;
Camm, AJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 59 :193-210
[9]   Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Go, AS ;
Barron, HV ;
Rundle, AC ;
Ornato, JP ;
Avins, AL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 129 (09) :690-+
[10]   BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
HOLLANDER, G ;
NADIMINTI, V ;
LICHSTEIN, E ;
GREENGART, A ;
SANDERS, M .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1983, 105 (05) :738-743