DIFFERENCES IN PREFERENCES BETWEEN DIABETIC-PATIENTS AND DIABETOLOGISTS REGARDING QUALITY OF CARE - A MATTER OF CONTINUITY AND EFFICIENCY OF CARE

被引:16
作者
CASPARIE, AF
VANDERWAAL, MAE
机构
[1] Institute of Health Care Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
关键词
QUALITY OF CARE; DIABETOLOGISTS; DIABETIC PATIENTS; PREFERENCES FOR ASPECTS OF CARE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb02087.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Diabetologists and diabetic patients were asked about their preferences for aspects of care which are considered of importance in relation to the quality of care. A questionnaire was constructed using the method of pairwise comparison in which respondents constantly had to chose between three statements in order to get a priority list. Adults with diabetes mellitus (Types 1 and 2) attending outpatient departments were asked to fill in the questionnaire. A response rate of 97% was recorded (n = 94). Diabetologists received a postal questionnaire and the response rate was 65% (n = 126). There was a reasonable agreement between both populations and 'effectiveness of care' was ranked the highest. However, the patients gave a significant higher ranking to 'continuity of care' and a lower ranking to 'efficiency'. Neither the age and sex of the patients nor the duration of the disease had any influence on their opinions. Patients who were treated with oral medication ranked 'information' higher than patients using insulin, but the difference was not significant. A lower level of education and having public-health insurance were associated with a higher preference for 'continuity'. No differences were found regarding age and sex within the diabetologist population.
引用
收藏
页码:828 / 832
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Wensing M, Grol R, Smiths A., Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis, Soc Sci Med, 38, pp. 45-53, (1994)
  • [2] Pawlson LG., Chronic illness: Implications of a new paradigm for health care, J Qual Improvement, 20, pp. 33-39, (1994)
  • [3] Casparie AF., View from the Netherlands, Quality in Health Care, 2, pp. 138-141, (1993)
  • [4] Ruwaard D, Hoogenveen RT, Verkleij H, Kromhout D, Casparie AF, van der Veen EA, Forecasting the number of diabetic patients in the Netherlands in 2005, Am J Public Health, 83, pp. 989-995, (1993)
  • [5] Batalden PB, Nelson EC., Hospital quality
  • [6] patients, physician and employee judgements, Int J Health Quality Ass, 3, pp. 7-17, (1991)
  • [7] Smith CH, Armstrong D., Comparison of criteria derived by the government and patients for evaluating general practitioners services, Br Med J, 299, pp. 494-496, (1989)
  • [8] Hares T, Spencer J, Gallagher M, Bradshaw C, Webb I., Diabetes care: who are the experts, Quality in Health Care, 1, pp. 219-224, (1992)
  • [9] Trochim WKM., An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation, Eval Program Plann, 12, pp. 1-16, (1989)
  • [10] Edwards AL., Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction, (1957)