POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION FOR TUBERCULOUS KYPHOSIS OF DORSAL AND LUMBAR SPINES

被引:271
|
作者
MOON, MS
WOO, YK
LEE, KS
HA, KY
KIM, SS
SUN, DH
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University Medical College, Kang-Nam St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul
关键词
ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION; KYPHOSIS; POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION; SPINE; TUBERCULOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199509000-00013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Thirty-nine adults and five children with active spinal tuberculosis and resulting kyphosis of the dorsal and lumbar spine who had combined posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion were observed to determine whether the corrected spinal deformity could be maintained until solid fusion. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined two-stage procedure for treating kyphosis due to active spinal tuberculosis. Summary of Background Data. Until 1970, with all methods of treatment, kyphosis due to active spinal tuberculosis tended to increase during therapy. Most of the patients treated with these methods were not happy with this residual kyphosis, even though their disease was arrested or cured. Kyphosis became their main concern regarding further treatment. Methods. A combined two-stage procedure, under the cover of 18 months of triple chemotherapy, was used for all patients. For posterior stabilization, the Harrington distraction system, Rush nails or Steinmann pins and wires, and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation were used. The diagnosis of successful interbody fusion was made if there was no loss of correction, no graft resorption or graft bed resorption, and if there was visible graft remodeling, such as trabeculation between the graft beds and graft and the graft hypertrophy. Results. In the 39 adults, average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up kyphosis angles were 37 degrees, 16 degrees, and 18 degrees, respectively. In four children, the average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up kyphosis angles were 55 degrees, 28 degrees, and 31 degrees, respectively. The loss of correction did not exceed 3 degrees. For one-segment spondylodesis, the average fusion times were 4 months in adults and 3.5 months in children. For a two-segment fusion, the average fusion times were 6 months in adults and 6.3 months in children. Conclusion. Posterior instrumental stabilization and anterior interbody fusion were found helpful in arresting the disease early, providing early fusion, preventing progression of kyphosis, and correcting the kyphosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1910 / 1916
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Clinical Efficacy in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, and Hybrid Surgery
    Zhu, Zhenbiao
    Xuan, Anwu
    Xu, Cheng
    Wang, Chaofeng
    He, Qing
    Tang, Liang
    Ruan, Dike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (06) : 756 - 768
  • [42] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Does stable anterior fixation matter?
    Madan, SS
    Harley, JM
    Boeree, NR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (04) : 386 - 392
  • [43] Microscopic anterior foraminal decompression combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Shin, Sang-Ha
    Choi, Won-Gyu
    Hwang, Byeong-Wook
    Tsang, Yi-Sheng
    Chung, Ewy-Ryong
    Lee, Hyeong-Chang
    Lee, Sang-Jin
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (10) : 1190 - 1199
  • [44] Effects of Anterior Plating on Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Snyder, Laura A.
    Kalb, Samuel
    Kakarla, Udaya K.
    Porter, Randall W.
    Kaibara, Taro
    Dickman, Curtis A.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (07): : 300 - 304
  • [45] Focal Correction of Severe Fixed Kyphosis with Single Level Posterior Ponte Osteotomy and Interbody Fusion
    Molloy, Seth S.
    Ahmad, Faiz U.
    Baum, Griffin R.
    Green, Barth A.
    Lebwohl, Nathan H.
    CUREUS, 2016, 8 (06):
  • [46] Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Patel, Yatindra
    Berger, Ryan J.
    Newman, Jared M.
    Anis, Hiba K.
    Ehiorobo, Joseph O.
    Khlopas, Anton
    Desai, Rohan
    Hollern, Douglas A.
    Schwartz, Jeffrey M.
    Paulino, Carl B.
    Mont, Michael A.
    SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL-INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SURGERY AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 35
  • [47] Anterior fusion alone compared with combined anterior and posterior fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis
    Song, K. -J.
    Johnson, J. S.
    Choi, B. -R.
    Wang, J. C.
    Lee, K. -B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (11): : 1548 - 1552
  • [48] One-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation in treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective case series
    Zhang, Hong-qi
    Lin, Min-zhong
    Li, Jin-song
    Tang, Ming-xing
    Guo, Chao-feng
    Wu, Jian-huang
    Liu, Jin-yang
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2013, 133 (03) : 333 - 341
  • [49] The posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages (PLIF) and transpedicular stabilization
    Diedrich, O
    Kraft, CN
    Perlick, L
    Schmitt, O
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2001, 62 (03): : 106 - 113
  • [50] Comparison of the safety outcomes between two surgical approaches for anterior lumbar fusion surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF)
    Haertl, Roger
    Joeris, Alexander
    McGuire, Robert A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) : 1484 - 1521