Symposium introduction: usable knowledge in practice. What action research has to offer to critical policy studies

被引:22
作者
Bartels, Koen P. R. [1 ]
Wittmayer, Julia Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Bangor Univ, Business Sch, Management Studies, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dutch Res Inst Transit DRIFT, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
action research; methods; practice; usable knowledge; reflexivity; change;
D O I
10.1080/19460171.2014.957335
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Critical policy analysts aim to serve policy actors in dealing with the intricate problems they face by facilitating productive communication, critical learning and sustainable change. Action research is a valuable approach for living up to this ambition. As it is rarely used in the field of critical policy analysis, this symposium further explores what action research has to offer. In this introduction, we draw out the main principles, practices and dilemmas of action research, provide an overview of the four contributions to the symposium and set out an agenda for future action research. We argue that action research is a useful approach for generating reflexivity, learning and change among the actors implicated in the problem at hand and its wider context, as well as for grasping the meaning of 'knowledge' and 'research' within current science-practice relations. At the same time, it is challenging because, in practice, it means facing the diverse, contested meanings of usable knowledge in both of these settings. Hence, we encourage future action research to further come to terms with the actual possibilities and constraints of the transformative ambitions of CPS.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 406
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HDB ACTION RES PARTI
[2]  
Argyris C., 2004, REASONS RATIONALIZAT
[3]  
Bartels K. P. R., 2012, ADM THEORY PRAXIS, V34, P433, DOI DOI 10.2753/ATP1084-1806340306
[4]   Participation under a spell of instrumentalization? Reflections on action research in an entrenched climate adaptation policy process [J].
Boezeman, Daan ;
Vink, Martinus ;
Leroy, Pieter ;
Halffman, Willem .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2014, 8 (04) :407-426
[5]   In the shadow of legalism: understanding community participation in an overly bureaucratic context [J].
Bonetti, Marta ;
Villa, Matteo .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2014, 8 (04) :447-464
[6]  
Bradbury H., 2003, QUAL SOC WORK, V2, P155, DOI [10.1177/1473325003002002003, DOI 10.1177/1473325003002002003]
[7]  
Brydon-Miller M., 2003, ACTION RES-LONDON, V1, P9, DOI [10.1177/14767503030011002, DOI 10.1177/14767503030011002]
[8]   Action research: Explaining the diversity [J].
Cassell, Catherine ;
Johnson, Phil .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2006, 59 (06) :783-814
[9]  
Dick, 2004, ACTION RES, V2, P425, DOI DOI 10.1177/1476750304047985
[10]  
Fischer F., DELIBERATIVE POLICY, P209