Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: implants and surgical approaches

被引:4
作者
Rizzo, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE | 2014年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
proximal interphalangeal joint; arthritis; arthroplasty;
D O I
10.1097/BCO.0000000000000149
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty remains an established surgical treatment option for the arthritic and painful PIP joint. A variety of materials have been used for arthroplasty including silicone, metal-plastic, and pyrolytic carbon. In addition, constrained and semiconstrained designs have been used. The constrained implants are more commonly indicated for patients with incompetent ligaments or poor soft-tissue stabilizers. A variety of surgical approaches have been proposed, including volar, dorsal, and lateral techniques. The volar approach is more commonly used with the silicone implants, as the more precise cuts for newer nonconstrained implants were designed with the instrumentation in mind for the dorsal approach. Outcomes of PIP joint arthroplasty generally reflect excellent pain relief. Arthroplasty does afford some mobility, as opposed to arthrodesis, of the PIP joint. However, range of motion after PIP joint replacement is less predictable and may not provide improvement compared with preoperative measures. Unfortunately, reoperation rates after PIP joint arthroplasty are not inconsequential, and salvage of failed arthroplasty options are limited and include (not uncommonly) arthrodesis. Thus, counseling of the patient regarding risk and benefits of the arthroplasty is critical in tempering expectations and helping the patient determine their best treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 419
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] THE EXTENSOR TENDON SPLITTING APPROACH TO THE PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT: DO WE NEED TO REINSERT THE CENTRAL SLIP?
    Afifi, A. M.
    Richards, A.
    Medoro, A.
    Mercer, D.
    Moneim, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2010, 35E (03) : 188 - 191
  • [2] Ashworth CR, 1997, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P34
  • [3] Ling-Term Results of Swanson Silicone Arthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis
    Bales, Joshua G.
    Wall, Lindley B.
    Stern, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (03): : 455 - 461
  • [4] CHAMAY A, 1988, Annales de Chirurgie de la Main, V7, P179, DOI 10.1016/S0753-9053(88)80061-9
  • [5] WEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CANINE ACETABULUM AGAINST DIFFERENT FEMORAL PROSTHESES
    COOK, SD
    THOMAS, KA
    KESTER, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1989, 71 (02): : 189 - 197
  • [6] Osseointegration and mechanical stability of pyrocarbon and titanium hand implants in a load-bearing in vivo model for small joint arthroplasty
    Daecke, W
    Veyel, K
    Wieloch, P
    Jung, M
    Lorenz, H
    Martini, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 31A (01): : 90 - 97
  • [7] Duncan Scott F M, 2009, Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, V13, P47, DOI 10.1097/BTH.0b013e31818c0f71
  • [8] A conservative approach for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty
    Fahmy, NR
    Lavender, A
    Brew, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2001, 26 (03) : 235 - 237
  • [9] Froelich John M, 2014, Hand (N Y), V9, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11552-013-9571-0
  • [10] Revision Arthroplasty for Failed Silicone Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: Indications and 8-Year Results
    Herren, Daniel B.
    Keuchel, Tina
    Marks, Miriam
    Schindele, Stephan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (03): : 462 - 466