Consent Timing and Experience: Modifiable Factors That May Influence Interest in Clinical Research

被引:16
作者
Gerber, David E. [1 ]
Rasco, Drew W. [1 ]
Skinner, Celette Sugg [1 ]
Dowell, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Yan, Jingsheng [1 ]
Sayne, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Xie, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JOP.2011.000335
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Low rates of participation in cancer clinical trials have been attributed to patient, institutional, and study characteristics. However, few studies have examined factors related to the consent process. We therefore evaluated the impact of consent timing and experience on markers of patient interest in research. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in a cancer center tissue repository. During enrollment, patients were asked if they were willing to be contacted in the future to provide medical follow-up information and/ or to participate in other clinical research. We analyzed the association between patient responses to these questions and consent process factors using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 922 patients evaluated, 85% agreed to be contacted to provide follow-up information, and 83% agreed to be contacted to participate in future research studies. In univariate analysis, willingness to be contacted for future research was associated with consenter experience (P =.01) and had a trend toward association with the timing of enrollment in relation to diagnosis (P = .08), but it was not associated with patient sex, race, or diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, responses remained associated with consenter experience (P =.02). Conclusion: Factors related to the consent process, including consenter experience and timing of study enrollment, are significantly associated with or have a trend toward association with markers of patient interest in clinical research. These understudied and potentially modifiable variables warrant further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 96
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials - A pilot study [J].
Advani, AS ;
Atkeson, B ;
Brown, CL ;
Peterson, BL ;
Fish, L ;
Johnson, JL ;
Gockerman, JP ;
Gautier, M .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (06) :1499-1506
[2]   Influence of clinical communication on patients' decision making on participation in clinical trials [J].
Albrecht, Terrance L. ;
Eggly, Susan S. ;
Gleason, Marci E. J. ;
Harper, Felicity W. K. ;
Foster, Tanina S. ;
Peterson, Amy M. ;
Orom, Heather ;
Penner, Louis A. ;
Ruckdeschel, John C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (16) :2666-2673
[3]   Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care [J].
Back, Anthony L. ;
Arnold, Robert M. ;
Baile, Walter F. ;
Fryer-Edwards, Kelly A. ;
Alexander, Stewart C. ;
Barley, Gwyn E. ;
Gooley, Ted A. ;
Tulsky, James A. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (05) :453-460
[4]   READABILITY OF INFORMED CONSENT FORMS FOR RESEARCH IN A VETERANS-ADMINISTRATION-MEDICAL-CENTER [J].
BAKER, MT ;
TAUB, HA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 250 (19) :2646-2648
[5]   The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years [J].
Berger, O. ;
Gronberg, B. H. ;
Sand, K. ;
Kaasa, S. ;
Loge, J. H. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (02) :379-385
[6]   Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials [J].
Comis, RL ;
Miller, JD ;
Aldigé, CR ;
Krebs, L ;
Stoval, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :830-835
[7]   Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
Jenkins, V ;
Farewell, V ;
Saul, J ;
Duffy, A ;
Eves, R .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9307) :650-656
[8]   Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research - A systematic review [J].
Flory, J ;
Emanuel, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13) :1593-1601
[9]   African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study [J].
Freimuth, VS ;
Quinn, SC ;
Thomas, SB ;
Cole, G ;
Zook, E ;
Duncan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (05) :797-808
[10]   A study in contrasts: Eligibility criteria in a twenty-year sample of NSABP and POG clinical trials [J].
Fuks, A ;
Weijer, C ;
Freedman, B ;
Shapiro, S ;
Skrutkowska, M ;
Riaz, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (02) :69-79