Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-only rectum radiotherapy with a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution

被引:22
作者
Maspero, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Tyyger, Marcus D. [1 ,3 ]
Tijssen, Rob H. N. [1 ]
Seevinck, Peter R. [2 ,4 ]
Intven, Martijn P. W. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Ctr Image Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Leeds Teaching Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Image Sci Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 7卷
关键词
MRI; MR; CT; Medical imaging; Dose calculation; MR-only radiotherapy; Position verification; Image-guided radiotherapy; IGRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2018.09.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images enable magnetic resonance (MR)-based dose calculations. This work investigated whether a commercially available sCT generation solution was suitable for accurate dose calculations and position verification on patients with rectal cancer. Material and methods: For twenty rectal cancer patients computed tomography (CT) images were rigidly registered to sCT images. Clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were recalculated on registered CT and sCT images. Dose deviations were determined through gamma and voxelwise analysis. The impact on position verification was investigated by identifying differences in translations and rotation between cone-beam CT (CBCT) to CT and CBCT to sCT registrations. Results: Across twenty patients, within a threshold of 90% of the prescription dose, a gamma analysis (2%, 2 mm) mean pass rate of 95.2 +/- 4.0% (+/- 1 sigma) and mean dose deviation of -0.3 +/- 0.2% of prescription dose were obtained. The mean difference of translations and rotations over ten patients (76 CBCTs) was < 1 mm and < 0.5 degrees in all directions. In the sole posterior-anterior direction a mean systematic shift of 0.7 +/- 0.6 mm was found. Conclusions: Accurate MR-based dose calculations using a commercial sCT generation method were clinically feasible for treatment of rectal cancer patients. The accuracy of position verification was clinically acceptable. However, before clinical implementation future investigations will be performed to determine the origin of the systematic shift.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 64
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging alone [J].
Lee, YK ;
Bollet, M ;
Charles-Edwards, G ;
Flower, MA ;
Leach, MO ;
McNair, H ;
Moore, E ;
Rowbottom, C ;
Webb, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 66 (02) :203-216
[22]  
Li DW, 2017, PHYS MED BIOL, V62, P272, DOI [10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/272, 10.1088/1361-6560/62/8/2935]
[23]  
Low Daniel A., 2010, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V250, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012071
[24]   Quantification of confounding factors in MRI-based dose calculations as applied to prostate IMRT [J].
Maspero, Matteo ;
Seevinck, Peter R. ;
Schubert, Gerald ;
Hoesl, Michaela A. U. ;
van Asselen, Bram ;
Viergever, Max A. ;
Lagendijk, Jan J. W. ;
Meijer, Gert J. ;
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (03) :948-965
[25]   MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges [J].
Owrangi, Amir M. ;
Greer, Peter B. ;
Glide-Hurst, Carri K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (05)
[26]   MR-OPERA: A Multicenter/Multivendor Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaginge-Only Prostate Treatment Planning Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images [J].
Persson, Emilia ;
Gustafsson, Christian ;
Nordstrom, Fredrik ;
Sohlin, Maja ;
Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn ;
Petruson, Karin ;
Rintela, Niina ;
Hed, Kristoffer ;
Blomqvist, Lennart ;
Zackrisson, Bjorn ;
Nyholm, Tufve ;
Olsson, Lars E. ;
Siversson, Carl ;
Jonsson, Joakim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03) :692-700
[27]   Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion [J].
Scaife, J. ;
Harrison, K. ;
Romanchikova, M. ;
Parker, A. ;
Sutcliffe, M. ;
Bond, S. ;
Thomas, S. ;
Freeman, S. ;
Jena, R. ;
Bates, A. ;
Burnet, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 87 (1042)
[28]   Radiotherapy planning using MRI [J].
Schmidt, Maria A. ;
Payne, Geoffrey S. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (22) :R323-R361
[29]   A COMPARISON OF THE 2 ONE-SIDED TESTS PROCEDURE AND THE POWER APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE EQUIVALENCE OF AVERAGE BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
SCHUIRMANN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1987, 15 (06) :657-680
[30]   MRI staging of low rectal cancer [J].
Shihab, Oliver C. ;
Moran, Brendan J. ;
Heald, Richard J. ;
Quirke, Philip ;
Brown, Gina .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) :643-650