One of the aspects that the Geography must to confront is that big part of its scientific vocabulary make the vocabulary of daily use, vulgar knowleges or current use. This situation forces to the investigator to take a reflexive and critic position. In the same way, into the Geography a situation of confusion takes place, because same terms are uses with different meaning. The situation must be clarified, in a meticulous way, like constructive and superative instance. It is frequent to find concepts like space, middle, place, terrestrial space, natural frame, landscape, envoronment, region, territory, between others; this concepts are uses some times like synonymous in the investigations. Then the Geography in the same way that other social sciences it must to pay accounts with the spontaneous Geography. Because from its existente it shares its specific vocabulary with citizens in the daily life; this situation gives a major imprecision to the scientific terminology and it gives also major vulnerability of the theoretical and methodology content. The aim of the present writing is to analyze the different concepts arisen in the society-nature relationship from the Geography and environmental approaches. This can to make possible the strengthening of a scientific speech that it can to move later investigations.
