Theory and practice in the history of ideas. Implications for Applied Anthropology

被引:0
作者
Gimenez Romero, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Catedratico Antropol Social, Madrid, Spain
来源
GAZETA DE ANTROPOLOGIA | 2012年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
thought and action; knowledge and transformation; praxis; practical anthropology; knowledge dialogue;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This text is the first in a series of works of the author focused on the foundation of practical anthropology. It assumes that the conceptual basis of applied social science in general and, in particular, applied anthropology, and public guidance involved, requires a reasoned position regarding the relationship between theory and practice. The text reviews the contributions of Aristotle, Vico, Kant, and Marx from four key works, all these milestones with regard to the links between thought and action. The essay argues that we must overcome the hegemonic conception of the one-way relationship - from theory to practice-which reduces the connection related to the mere matter of the application. From the abovementioned authors, and as threads of successive trials on other key authors and works, there is the dire need to: a) recognize the plurality of knowledge, b) define the concept of theory and practice, c) grant firstness to practice d) consider the set of links between thought and action. The connections between practice and theory are systematized into four processes and times: (I) the generation of every theory in practical contexts, (II) the use and application of knowledge, (III) the validation or verification of the theory (also) through praxis, and (IV) theorizing (also) from the practice. The essay ends with a joint proposal of theory and practice in line with the acquis and drawn from the following features: towards a joint science-based, dialectical nature of ethically concerned, public-oriented and technically operational.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Abbagnano Nicolas, 1988, FILOSOFIA CONT, V6
  • [2] Aristoteles, 1981, 1967 ETICA NICOMAQUE
  • [3] Aristoteles, 2010, ETICA NICOMAQUEA ETI
  • [4] Aubenque P., 1999, PRUDENCIA ARISTOTELE
  • [5] ERIKSEN TH, 2005, ENGAGING ANTHR CASE
  • [6] Flyvbjerg B., 2001, MAKING SOCIAL SCI MA, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511810503
  • [7] Gimenez Carlos, 2011, ACT 12 C ANTR
  • [8] Gimenez Carlos, 1999, ANTROPOLOGIA MAS ACA
  • [9] Gledhill John, 2000, PODER SUS DISFRACES
  • [10] Goma J., 2010, PREFACIO ETICA NOCOM, P9