INACTION INERTIA - FORGOING FUTURE BENEFITS AS A RESULT OF AN INITIAL FAILURE TO ACT

被引:103
作者
TYKOCINSKI, OE
PITTMAN, TS
TUTTLE, EE
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Gettysburg College
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.793
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The circumstances under which initial inaction tends to persist were studied. Inaction inertia occurs when bypassing an initial action opportunity decreases the likelihood that subsequent similar action opportunities will be taken. The authors studied the case in which an initial attractive action opportunity, which is not taken, is followed by another positive but somewhat less attractive action opportunity. In 6 experiments, participants were less likely to take the second action when the discrepancy in attractiveness between the initial and final action opportunities was relatively large, compared with small-discrepancy participants or control participants, who were offered only the second opportunity. This finding was obtained using both a scenario methodology and an actual experimental situation. Possible explanations for inaction inertia based on perceptual contrast, dissonance, self-perception, or commitment theories were tested but were not clearly supported. Experiment 6, however, indicated that framing the initial inaction as a loss plays an important mediating role in producing inaction inertia.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 803
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   THE FEATURE-POSITIVE EFFECT, ATTITUDE STRENGTH, AND DEGREE OF PERCEIVED CONSENSUS [J].
ALLISON, ST ;
MESSICK, DM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1988, 14 (02) :231-241
[2]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COST [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :124-140
[4]   POSTDECISION CHANGES IN THE DESIRABILITY OF ALTERNATIVES [J].
BREHM, JW .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 52 (03) :384-389
[5]   LOW-BALL PROCEDURE FOR PRODUCING COMPLIANCE - COMMITMENT THEN COST [J].
CIALDINI, RB ;
BASSETT, R ;
CACIOPPO, JT ;
MILLER, JA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (05) :463-476
[6]  
Cialdini RB, 1985, INFLUENCE SCI PRACTI
[7]   A NEW LOOK AT DISSONANCE THEORY [J].
COOPER, J ;
FAZIO, RH .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 17 :229-266
[8]  
FAZIO RH, 1982, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V42, P404
[9]  
Festinger L., 1957, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS
[10]   ATTITUDINAL EFFECTS OF INADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION [J].
FREEDMAN, JL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1963, 31 (03) :371-385