HOW EQUITY CONQUERED COMMON-LAW - THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN HISTORICAL-PERSPECTIVE

被引：273
作者：
SUBRIN, SN
机构：
来源：
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW | 1987年 / 135卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
10.2307/3312053
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：909 / 1002
页数：94
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A DIVIDED SUPREME-COURT ADOPTS DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [J].
FRIEDENTHAL, JH .
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1981, 69 (03) :806-820
[32]   AFTER 50 YEARS OF THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - ARE THE BARRIERS TO JUSTICE BEING RAISED [J].
WEINSTEIN, JB .
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1989, 137 (06) :1901-1923
[33]   THE NEW AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - THE 1ST 4 MONTHS [J].
LONG, KC .
FEDERAL BAR NEWS & JOURNAL, 1984, 31 (01) :36-38
[34]   RULE-11 OF THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE DUTY TO WITHDRAW A BASELESS PLEADING [J].
COWLES, JK .
FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 1988, 56 (04) :697-723
[35]   PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION OF NON-PARTIES UNDER THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [J].
不详 .
IOWA LAW REVIEW, 1958, 43 (03) :375-385
[36]   REDUCING COURT COSTS AND DELAY - THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [J].
MARCUS, RL .
JUDICATURE, 1983, 66 (08) :363-370
[37]   DISCOVERY OF RETAINED NON-TESTIFYING EXPERTS IDENTITIES UNDER THE FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [J].
不详 .
MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1982, 80 (03) :513-523
[38]   VOCABULARY OF THE COMMON-LAW, VOL 1, PROPERTY LAW - CIVIL PROCEDURE - MCLAUGHLIN,M [J].
SMITH, JAC .
CANADIAN BAR REVIEW-REVUE DU BARREAU CANADIEN, 1984, 62 (04) :741-746
[39]   FEDERAL-RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - DEFINING A FEASIBLE CULPABILITY THRESHOLD FOR THE IMPOSITION OF SEVERE DISCOVERY SANCTIONS [J].
不详 .
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1980, 65 (01) :137-157
[40]   THE CURIOUS NOTION THAT THE RULES OF DECISION ACT BLOCKS SUPREME FEDERAL COMMON-LAW [J].
WEINBERG, L .
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1989, 83 (04) :860-875
12345