Particle swarm optimization algorithm for mean-variance portfolio optimization: A case study of Istanbul Stock Exchange

被引:1
作者
Akyer, Hasan [1 ]
Kalayci, Can Berk [1 ]
Aygoren, Hakan [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Muhendisl Fak, Endustri Muhendisligi Bolumu, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Iktisadi & Idari Bilimler Fak, Isletme Bolumu, Denizli, Turkey
来源
PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2018年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Mean-variance model; Heuristic methods; Particle swarm optimization;
D O I
10.5505/pajes.2017.91145
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
While investors used to create their portfolios according to traditional portfolio theory in the past, today modern portfolio approach is widely preferred. The basis of the modern portfolio theory was suggested by Harry Markowitz with the mean variance model. A greater number of securities in a portfolio is difficult to manage and has an increased transaction cost. Therefore, the number of securities in the portfolio should be restricted. The problem of portfolio optimization with cardinality constraints is NP-Hard. Meta-heuristic methods are generally preferred to solve since problems in this class are difficult to be solved with exact solution algorithms within acceptable times. In this study, a particle swarm optimization algorithm has been adapted to solve the portfolio optimization problem and applied to Istanbul Stock Exchange. The experiments show that while in low risk levels it is required to invest into more number of assets in order to converge unconstrained efficient frontier, as risk level increases the number of assets to be held is decreased.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 129
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mean-Variance Optimization for Asset Allocation
    Kim, Jang Ho
    Lee, Yongjae
    Kim, Woo Chang
    Fabozzi, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (05) : 24 - 40
  • [22] Multiperiod portfolio optimization models in stochastic markets using the mean-variance approach
    Celikyurt, U.
    Ozekici, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (01) : 186 - 202
  • [23] Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization with Markov switching parameters
    Departamento de Engenharia de Telecomunicações e Controle, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, CEP: 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Controle y Automacao, 2008, 19 (02): : 138 - 146
  • [24] Track Allocation Optimization in Railway Station: Mean-Variance Model and Case Study
    Wu, Jianjun
    Kang, Liujiang
    Sun, Huijun
    Jia, Xiaolei
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2013, 139 (05): : 540 - 547
  • [25] Robust empirical optimization is almost the same as mean-variance optimization
    Gotoh, Jun-ya
    Kim, Michael Jong
    Lim, Andrew E. B.
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 46 (04) : 448 - 452
  • [26] Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio optimization in a jump-diffusion market
    Alp O.S.
    Korn R.
    Decisions in Economics and Finance, 2011, 34 (1) : 21 - 40
  • [27] Enhancing mean-variance portfolio optimization through GANs-based anomaly detection
    Kim, Jang Ho
    Kim, Seyoung
    Lee, Yongjae
    Kim, Woo Chang
    Fabozzi, Frank J.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025, 346 (01) : 217 - 244
  • [28] A generalized multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization with Markov switching parameters
    Costa, Oswaldo L. V.
    Araujo, Michael V.
    AUTOMATICA, 2008, 44 (10) : 2487 - 2497
  • [29] Addressing energy trilemma via the modified Markowitz Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization theory
    Stempien, J. P.
    Chan, S. H.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 202 : 228 - 237
  • [30] The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem using a local search-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
    Chen, Bili
    Lin, Yangbin
    Zeng, Wenhua
    Xu, Hang
    Zhang, Defu
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 47 (02) : 505 - 525