Finite-Sample System Identification: An Overview and a New Correlation Method

被引:51
作者
Care, Algo [1 ]
Csaji, Balazs Cs [2 ]
Campi, Marco C. [3 ]
Weyer, Erik [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Wiskunde & Informat, NL-1098 XG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci MTA, Inst Comp Sci & Control SZTAKI, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Univ Brescia, Dept Informat Engn, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS | 2018年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Identification; estimation;
D O I
10.1109/LCSYS.2017.2720969
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Finite-sample system identification algorithms can be used to build guaranteed confidence regions for unknown model parameters under mild statistical assumptions. It has been shown that in many circumstances these rigorously built regions are comparable in size and shape to those that could be built by resorting to the asymptotic theory. The latter sets are, however, not guaranteed for finite samples and can sometimes lead to misleading results. The general principles behind finite-sample methods make them virtually applicable to a large variety of even nonlinear systems. While these principles are simple enough, a rigorous treatment of the attendant technical issues makes the corresponding theory complex and not easy to access. This is believed to be one of the reasons why these methods have not yet received widespread acceptance by the identification community and this letter is meant to provide an easy access point to finite-sample system identification by presenting the fundamental ideas underlying these methods in a simplified manner. We then review three (classes of) methods that have been proposed so far-1) Leave-out Sign-dominant Correlation Regions (LSCR); 2) Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS); 3) Perturbed Dataset Methods (PDMs). By identifying some difficulties inherent in these methods, we also propose in this letter a new sign-perturbation method based on correlation which overcome some of these difficulties.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Non-Asymptotic Confidence Sets for the Parameters of Linear Transfer Functions [J].
Campi, Marco C. ;
Weyer, Erik .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2010, 55 (12) :2708-2720
[2]   Guaranteed non-asymptotic confidence regions in system identification [J].
Campi, MC ;
Weyer, E .
AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (10) :1751-1764
[3]  
Care A, 2016, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P262, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2016.7798280
[4]   Sign-Perturbed Sums: A New System Identification Approach for Constructing Exact Non-Asymptotic Confidence Regions in Linear Regression Models [J].
Csaji, Balazs Csanad ;
Campi, Marco Claudio ;
Weyer, Erik .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 63 (01) :169-181
[5]  
Csaji BC, 2012, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P7321, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2012.6425882
[6]   Parameter identification for nonlinear systems: Guaranteed confidence regions through LSCR [J].
Dalai, Marco ;
Weyer, Erik ;
Campi, Marco C. .
AUTOMATICA, 2007, 43 (08) :1418-1425
[7]   Assessing the quality of identified models through the asymptotic theory - when is the result reliable? [J].
Garatti, S ;
Campi, MC ;
Bittanti, S .
AUTOMATICA, 2004, 40 (08) :1319-1332
[8]   Guaranteed characterization of exact non-asymptotic confidence regions as defined by LSCR and SPS [J].
Kieffer, Michel ;
Walter, Eric .
AUTOMATICA, 2014, 50 (02) :507-512
[9]   Perturbed datasets methods for hypothesis testing and structure of corresponding confidence sets [J].
Kolumban, Sandor ;
Vajk, Istvan ;
Schoukens, Johan .
AUTOMATICA, 2015, 51 :326-331
[10]  
Lennart L., 1999, PRENTICE HALL INFORM, V2nd