Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise

被引:205
作者
Riley, William T. [1 ]
Glasgow, Russell E. [1 ]
Etheredge, Lynn [2 ]
Abernethy, Amy P. [3 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
Research methods; Rapid learning; Research review; Stakeholder engagement; Rapid research; Research relevance; Dissemination and implementation;
D O I
10.1186/2001-1326-2-10
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Our current health research enterprise is painstakingly slow and cumbersome, and its results seldom translate into practice. The slow pace of health research contributes to findings that are less relevant and potentially even obsolete. To produce more rapid, responsive, and relevant research, we propose approaches that increase relevance via greater stakeholder involvement, speed research via innovative designs, streamline review processes, and create and/or better leverage research infrastructure. Broad stakeholder input integrated throughout the research process can both increase relevance and facilitate study procedures. More flexible and rapid research designs should be considered before defaulting to the traditional two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), but even traditional RCTs can be designed for more rapid findings. Review processes for grant applications, IRB protocols, and manuscript submissions can be better streamlined to minimize delays. Research infrastructures such as rapid learning systems and other health information technologies can be leveraged to rapidly evaluate new and existing treatments, and alleviate the extensive recruitment delays common in traditional research. These and other approaches are feasible but require a culture shift among the research community to value not only methodological rigor, but also the pace and relevance of research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Balas E. A., 2000, MANAGING CLIN KNOWLE
[2]  
Bender MW, MCKINSEY Q
[3]  
Boudreau KJ, NOVELTY PARADOX BIAS
[4]  
Brown CA, 2006, BMC MED RES METHODOL, DOI [10.1186/1471-2288-6-54, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54]
[5]   Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis [J].
Chimowitz, Marc I. ;
Lynn, Michael J. ;
Derdeyn, Colin P. ;
Turan, Tanya N. ;
Fiorella, David ;
Lane, Bethany F. ;
Janis, L. Scott ;
Lutsep, Helmi L. ;
Barnwell, Stanley L. ;
Waters, Michael F. ;
Hoh, Brian L. ;
Hourihane, J. Maurice ;
Levy, Elad I. ;
Alexandrov, Andrei V. ;
Harrigan, Mark R. ;
Chiu, David ;
Klucznik, Richard P. ;
Clark, Joni M. ;
McDougall, Cameron G. ;
Johnson, Mark D. ;
Pride, G. Lee, Jr. ;
Torbey, Michel T. ;
Zaidat, Osama O. ;
Rumboldt, Zoran ;
Cloft, Harry J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (11) :993-1003
[6]  
Collins F, VISION NATL PATIENT
[7]   The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) - New methods for more potent eHealth interventions [J].
Collins, Linda M. ;
Murphy, Susan A. ;
Strecher, Victor .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (05) :S112-S118
[8]   A rapid-learning health system [J].
Etheredge, Lynn M. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (02) :W107-W118
[9]  
Fiore LD, 2011, CLIN TRIALS, V8, P183, DOI [10.1177/1740774510395635, 10.1177/1740774511398368]
[10]   Agile methods for open source safety-critical software [J].
Gary, Kevin ;
Enquobahrie, Andinet ;
Ibanez, Luis ;
Cheng, Patrick ;
Yaniv, Ziv ;
Cleary, Kevin ;
Kokoori, Shylaja ;
Muffih, Benjamin ;
Heidenreich, John .
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2011, 41 (09) :945-962