An ERP Study in English Relative Clause Processing by Chinese-English Bilinguals

被引:1
作者
Wang Huili [1 ]
Ma Liwen [2 ]
Wang Youyou [3 ]
Troyer, Melissa [4 ]
Li Qiang [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, English, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Louisiana, Lafayette, CA USA
关键词
relative clause; subject preference; Chinese-English bilinguals; ERP;
D O I
10.1515/cjal-2015-0001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The processing of relative clauses receives much concern from linguists. The finding that object relatives are easier to process than subject relatives in Chinese challenges the notion that subject relative clauses are preferred universally. A large body of literature provides theories related to sentence processing mechanisms for native speakers but leaves one area relatively untouched: how bilinguals process sentences. This study is designed to examine the case where the individuals with a Chinese L1 language background process subject-extracted subject relative clauses (SS) and subject-extracted object relative clauses (SO) by using event-related potentials (ERPs) to probe into the real-time language processing and presents a direct manifestation of brain activity. The findings from this study support the subject relative clause preference due to the strong influence of English relative clause markedness and bilinguals' relative lower working memory capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 35
页数:33
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Vergara, Marta ;
de la Cruz-Pavia, Irene ;
Laka, Itziar .
COGNITION, 2010, 115 (01) :79-92
[2]   Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order? [J].
Casado, P ;
Martín-Loeches, M ;
Muñoz, F ;
Fernández-Frías, C .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 24 (03) :526-543
[3]  
Clifton C., 1989, LINGUISTICS STRUCTUR, P76
[4]  
Dai Y., 2010, J XI INT STUDIES U, V28, P20
[5]  
Doughty C.J., 1991, STUD SECOND LANG ACQ, V13, P431, DOI [10.1017/S0272263100010287, DOI 10.1017/S0272263100010287]
[6]   ON THE GENERALIZATION OF RELATIVE CLAUSE INSTRUCTION IN THE ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH AS A 2ND LANGUAGE [J].
ECKMAN, FR ;
BELL, L ;
NELSON, D .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1988, 9 (01) :1-20
[7]   A METHOD FOR OBTAINING MEASURES OF LOCAL PARSING COMPLEXITY THROUGHOUT SENTENCES [J].
FORD, M .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 22 (02) :203-218
[8]   MONITORING AROUND THE RELATIVE CLAUSE [J].
FRAUENFELDER, U ;
SEGUI, J ;
MEHLER, J .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (03) :328-337
[9]   SYNTACTIC PROCESSING - EVIDENCE FROM DUTCH [J].
FRAZIER, L .
NATURAL LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC THEORY, 1987, 5 (04) :519-559
[10]   Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing [J].
Friederici, AD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (02) :78-84