THE USE OF TOPICAL GUANETHIDINE IN THE RELIEF OF DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY

被引:6
作者
DUNNE, SM [1 ]
HANNINGTONKIFF, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] FRIMLEY PK HOSP,CTR PAIN RELIEF,CAMBERLEY GU16 5UJ,SURREY,ENGLAND
关键词
DENTIN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; GUANETHIDINE;
D O I
10.1016/0304-3959(93)90205-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
After a pilot study had indicated that the topical application of guanethidine might be of value in the treatment of tooth dentine hypersensitivity, a double-blind study was undertaken to investigate whether guanethidine was more effective than a distilled water control in alleviating dentinal pain. In 39 adult subjects, who had complained of dentine hypersensitivity, a 1 sec blast of air from a dental 3-in-1 syringe was directed onto sensitive root dentine at an angle of 90-degrees from a distance of 1 cm. The severity of the resulting pain was indicated by the subject on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). One droplet of either 1% guanethidine monosulphate (Ismelin, Ciba-Geigy) or distilled water, allocated at random, was applied to the dentine for 1 min. The tooth was re-tested with the standardised air blast and a second VAS was marked by the subject. In total, 19 patients received guanethidine and 20 received water. VAS scores before treatment in the 2 groups treated with either guanethidine or water (means: 6.5 +/- 2.2 and 6.0 +/- 2.5, respectively) were not significantly different (Mann-Whitney, P = 0.48) whereas the VAS scores in the 2 groups after treatment with guanethidine or water (means: 2.7 +/- 2.4 and 4.8 +/- 2.9, respectively) were significantly different (Mann-Whitney, P < 0.02). It was concluded that guanethidine reduced dentinal hypersensitivity more effectively than distilled water. Within-group comparison of the pre- and post-treatment VAS scores, using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, showed that distilled water had also produced a significant improvement (P < 0.01), probably attesting the operation of a placebo effect; the improvement produced by guanethidine reached a greater level of significance (P < 0.001). This beneficial analgesic action of guanethidine may offer a novel, simple method of relieving the discomforts of dental conservation and restoration and lead to a better understanding of the hitherto obscure aetiology of dentinal pain.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 168
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
CLARK GE, 1990, TOOT HYPERSENSITIVIT, V34, P539
[2]  
CURRO FA, 1990, TOOTH HYPERSENSITIVI, V34, pR9
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF ADULT CANCER PAIN - SHORTCOMINGS OF CURRENT METHODS [J].
DESCHAMPS, M ;
BAND, PR ;
COLDMAN, AJ .
PAIN, 1988, 32 (02) :133-139
[4]   INFLUENCE OF CHANGES IN MICROCIRCULATION ON EXCITABILITY OF SENSORY UNIT IN TOOTH OF CAT [J].
EDWALL, L ;
SCOTT, D .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1971, 82 (04) :555-&
[5]   THE INCIDENCE OF HYPERSENSITIVE TEETH IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND [J].
FLYNN, J ;
GALLOWAY, R ;
ORCHARDSON, R .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1985, 13 (03) :230-236
[6]   LOCAL COLD BLOCK AND GUANETHIDINE [J].
HANNINGTONKIFF, JG .
PAIN, 1986, 26 (01) :130-131
[7]  
HANNINGTONKIFF JG, 1989, TXB PAIN, P754
[8]  
HANNINGTONKIFF JG, IN PRESS J ROY SOC M
[9]  
Huskisson E., 1983, PAIN MEASUREMENT ASS, P33
[10]   INNERVATION OF TEETH - QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE, AND DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT [J].
JOHNSEN, DC .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1985, 64 :555-563