A MULTICENTER STUDY - STAPHYLOCOCCUS AND ENTEROCOCCUS SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTIBIOTICS

被引:11
作者
TURANO, A
RAVIZZOLA, G
PERONI, L
CERUTI, T
GRECO, LM
PITZUS, E
SANTINI, G
CRESTI, S
SATTA, G
机构
[1] OSPED MAGGIORE,MICROBIOL LAB,CREMONA,ITALY
[2] OSPED ANNUNZIATA,MICROBIOL LAB,COSENZA,ITALY
[3] SPEDALI CIVILI,MICROBIOL LAB,UDINE,ITALY
[4] SPEDALI CIVILI,MICROBIOL LAB,PORDENONE,ITALY
[5] UNIV SIENA,INST MICROBIOL,I-53100 SIENA,ITALY
[6] CATHOLIC UNIV,INST MICROBIOL,ROME,ITALY
关键词
ACTIVITY OF GLYCOPEPTIDES; METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI;
D O I
10.1007/BF01719574
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A multicentre study to evaluate the susceptibility of Gram-positive cocci isolated from clinical samples, was performed by six centres working in different areas of Italy. We examined 4,544 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 4,381 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci and 2,478 strains of enterococci. The following antibiotics were tested: penicillin G, ampicillin, amoxicillin, piperacillin, imipenem, oxacillin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, netilmicin, rifampicin, clindamycin, tetracycline, cotrimoxazole, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, vancomycin and teicoplanin. Oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci confirmed their susceptibility to many other antimicrobial agents white oxacillin-resistant strains confirmed their multiple and frequent resistance to antibiotics. Resistance to oxacillin, cotrimoxazole and chloramphenicol was more frequent in coagulase-negative staphylococci than in Staphylococcus aureus. Aminoglycosides, rifampicin and quinolones were more active against coagulase-negative staphylococci than against Staphylococcus aureus. Enterococci were susceptible to penicillins and imipenem, and moderately susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Susceptibility of 70-79% was observed with high levels of aminoglycosides. Excellent results against staphylococci and enterococci were observed with vancomycin and teicoplanin.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 572
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Gialdroni Grassi G., Infections by Gram-positive bacteria: An overview, J Antimicrob Chemother, 21, pp. 1-7, (1988)
[2]  
Thornsberry C., The development of antimicrobial resistance in staphylococci, J Antimicrob Chemother, 21, pp. 9-16, (1988)
[3]  
Acar J.F., Buu-Hoi A.Y., Resistance patterns of important Gram-positive pathogens, J Antimicrob Chemother, 21, pp. 41-47, (1988)
[4]  
Hershow R.C., Starm A.M., A comparison of clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 13, pp. 587-593, (1992)
[5]  
Schito G.C., Varaldo P.E., Trends in the epidemiology and antibiotics resistance of clinical Staphylococcus strains in Italy: A review, J Antimicrob Chemother, 21, pp. 67-78, (1988)
[6]  
Starm A.M., Higher overall nosocomial infection rate because of increased attack rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, American Journal of Infection Control, 21, pp. 70-74, (1993)
[7]  
Wadsworth S.J., Kim K.H., Development of new antibiotic resistance in methicillin-resistant but not methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, J Antimicrob Chemoter, 30, pp. 821-826, (1992)
[8]  
Witte W., Klare I., Occurrence of quinolones resistance in Staphylococcus aureus for nosocomial infections, Epidemiol Infect, 109, pp. 413-421, (1992)
[9]  
Arioli V., Pallanza R., Teicoplanin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, Lancet, 1, (1987)
[10]  
Greenwood D., Microbiological properties of teicoplanin, J Antimicrob Chemother, 21, pp. 1-13, (1988)