Evaluation of PTW Seven29 for tomotherapy patient-specific quality assurance and comparison with ScandiDos Delta(4)

被引:12
作者
Myers, Pamela [1 ]
Stathakis, Sotirios [1 ]
Gutierrez, Alonso N. [1 ]
Esquivel, Carlos [1 ]
Mavroidis, Panayiotis [2 ,3 ]
Papanikolaou, Niko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Canc Therapy & Res Ctr, Dept Radiol & Radiat Oncol, 7979 Wurzbach Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Karolinska Inst, Med Radiat Phys, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Octavius phantom; patient QA; PTW Seven29; tomotherapy;
D O I
10.4103/0971-6203.94741
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For routine quality assurance of helical tomotherapy plans, an alternative method, as opposed to the TomoTherapy suggested cylindrical solid water phantom with film and ionization chamber, is proposed using the PTW Seven29 2D-ARRAY inserted in a dedicated octagonal phantom, called Octavius. First, the sensitivity of the array to pitch was studied by varying the pitch during planning to 0.287, 0.433, 1.0, and 2.0. For each pitch selected, the dependence on field size was investigated by generating plans with field widths (FWs) of 1.06 cm, 2.49 cm, and 5.02 cm, for a total of 12 plans. Secondly, a total of 15 patient QA plans were delivered using helical tomotherapy with the Delta(4) and Seven29/Octavius for comparison. Using the clinical gamma criteria, 3% and 3 mm, all FW and pitch plans had a passing percentage of > 90%. For patient QA plans, the average gamma pass percentage was 97.0% (94.4-99.8%) for the Delta (4) and 97.6% (92.5-100.0%) for the Seven29/Octavius. Both the Seven29/Octavius and Delta(4) performed to a high standard of measurement accuracy and had a 90% or greater gamma percent for all plans and were considered clinically acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 80
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PTW USER MANUAL OCTA
[3]   Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification [J].
Bedford, James L. ;
Lee, Young K. ;
Wai, Philip ;
South, Christopher P. ;
Warrington, Alan P. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (09) :N167-N176
[4]   Recent advances in radiotherapy [J].
Bhide, S. A. ;
Nutting, C. M. .
BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8
[5]   Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry [J].
Bucciolini, M ;
Buonamici, FB ;
Casati, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (01) :161-168
[6]   An intercomparison between film dosimetry and diode matrix for IMRT quality assurance [J].
Buonamici, F. Banci ;
Compagnucci, A. ;
Marrazzo, L. ;
Russo, S. ;
Bucciolini, M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1372-1379
[7]   Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA [J].
Chandraraj, Varatharaj ;
Stathakis, Sotirios ;
Manickam, Ravikumar ;
Esquivel, Carlos ;
Supe, Sanjay S. ;
Papanikolaou, Nikos .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (02) :338-349
[8]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[9]   Longitudinal study using a diode phantom for helical tomotherapy IMRT QA [J].
Geurts, M. ;
Gonzalez, J. ;
Serrano-Ojeda, P. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :4977-4983
[10]  
ICRU Jot, 2010, PRESCR REC REP PHOT, P1