RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE ANALYSIS IN THE PREDICTION OF CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - A MODEL FOR REPORTING ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL DATA

被引:19
|
作者
EISEN, A
SCHULZER, M
PANT, B
MACNEIL, M
STEWART, H
TRUEMAN, S
MAK, E
机构
[1] Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
关键词
CARPAL TUNNEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; PALMAR LATENCY;
D O I
10.1002/mus.880160715
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients were classified clinically as (1) normal exam and no symptoms (169 hands); (2) having a motor and/or sensory deficit typical of CTS (115 hands); (3) having a history characteristic of CTS (156 hands); and (4) nondiagnostic symptomatology (122 hands). Electrophysiological studies consisted of median and ulnar motor, sensory, and palmar measurements. Group mean values for group 1 differed significantly from groups 2 and 3 (not 4) for all measurements, but values overlapped considerably. Median distal motor latency (DMML) combined with median-ulnar palmar latency differences (MUPLD) had significantly superior discriminant power than other measurements and correlated highly for all groups (r values = 0.71-0.73). These variables were used to construct ROC curves and prediction tables. The approach used allows one to assign a percentage risk of having a CTS and can be used in outcome studies.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 796
页数:10
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Fundamentals and Applications of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis in the Research of Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease
    Roumeliotis, Stefanos
    Abd ElHafeez, Samar
    D'Arrigo, Graziella
    Fusaro, Maria
    Leonardis, Daniela
    Mezzatesta, Sabrina
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [2] Determining sensitivity of mammography from screening data, cancer incidence, and receiver-operating characteristic curve parameters
    Boone, JM
    Lindfors, KK
    Seibert, JA
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (03) : 228 - 237