Corporate Social Responsibility and Rule 144A Debt Offerings: Empirical Evidence

被引:6
作者
Dbouk, Wassim [1 ]
Jin, Dawei [2 ]
Wang, Haizhi [3 ]
Wang, Jianrong [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Suliman S Olayan Sch Business, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Informat & Safety Engn Sch, 182 Nahu Ave, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] IIT, Stuart Sch Business, 565 W Adams St, Chicago, IL 60661 USA
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
private placement; Rule; 144A; bond yield spread; corporate social responsibility;
D O I
10.3390/ijfs6040094
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Rule 144A allows a firm to issue securities without a public registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and only qualified institutional investors can purchase such securities. In this study, focusing on corporate bonds issued under Rule 144A, we empirically investigate the relationship between the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of issuing firms and the bond yield spread at issuance. We document a significant and positive relation between CSR concerns, whereas CSR strengths seem to play an insignificant role in determining bond yield spread. Our main findings are robust to the instrumental variable approach and simultaneous equation estimation to address the potential endogeneity issues. We further explore the time-series changes in issuing firms' CSR profiles, and report that institutional investors demand a higher bond yield spread when issuing firms' exposure to higher social, environmental, and stakeholder concerns. Our analyses reveal that the main sources of such risk exposure are stakeholder conflict and concerns from primary stakeholder groups.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Managerial compensation and the debt placement decision [J].
Albring, Susan M. ;
Khurana, Inder K. ;
Nejadmalayeri, Ali ;
Pereira, Raynolde .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2011, 17 (05) :1445-1456
[2]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[3]  
Amiraslani Hami, 2018, WORKING PAPER
[4]   WHY DO FIRMS REDUCE BUSINESS RISK [J].
AMIT, R ;
WERNERFELT, B .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1990, 33 (03) :520-533
[5]   The corporate choice between public debt, bank loans, traditional private debt placements, and 144A debt issues [J].
Arena M.P. .
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2011, 36 (3) :391-416
[6]   Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure [J].
Bae, Kee-Hong ;
Kang, Jun-Koo ;
Wang, Jin .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 100 (01) :130-153
[7]  
Barnea A, 2005, WORKING PAPER
[8]   Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122
[9]   Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility [J].
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Ciciretti, Rocco ;
Hasan, Iftekhar .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 35 :297-309
[10]   Corporate social responsibility and earnings forecasting unbiasedness [J].
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Ciciretti, Rocco ;
Giovannelli, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (09) :3654-3668