REGISTRATION OF LUNG-CANCER IN SCOTLAND - AN ASSESSMENT OF DATA ACCURACY BASED ON REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS

被引:14
作者
BREWSTER, D
MUIR, C
CRICHTON, J
机构
[1] NATL HLTH SERV,COMMON SERV AGCY,LONDON,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV EDINBURGH,INT ASSOC CANC REGISTRIES,CANC REGISTRAT SCOTLAND,EDINBURGH,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
[3] UNIV GLASGOW,INT ASSOC CANC REGISTRIES,CANC REGISTRAT SCOTLAND,GLASGOW,LANARK,SCOTLAND
关键词
DATA COLLECTION; DATA RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; LUNG NEOPLASMS; QUALITY CONTROL; REGISTRIES; SCOTLAND;
D O I
10.1007/BF00051405
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Lung cancer represents a major public health problem in Scotland. Cancer registration data permit the approximate incidence of this disease to be measured directly and the projected incidence to be modelled. Thus, in addition to epidemiologic studies and survival analyses, cancer registration data may be used for planning and monitoring relevant health services. Since the value of the data depends on their quality, we undertook a large-scale study of the accuracy of cancer registration data in Scotland The medical records of a random sample of cancer registrations attributed to the year 1990 were sought. The sample contained 340 registrations of lung cancer, 309 (91 percent) of which had relevant medical records available for scrutiny. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Results revealed 19 discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, gender, and date of birth) involving 16 (5.2 percent) patients. Most were trivial and would not disturb record linkage. Discrepancy rates were found to be: 7.8 percent in postcode of residence at the time of diagnosis, 10 percent in 'anniversary date' (excluding differences of six weeks or less), 12.5 percent in histologic verification status; 4.2 percent in ICD-9 site code (the first three digits), and 15.5 percent in four digit ICD-0 morphology code (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes). This relatively high level of accuracy gives weight to routinely published incidence figures and supports the use of these data for exploratory epidemiologic studies, assessment of health care needs, and calculation of survival.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 310
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
BLACK RJ, 1993, TRENDS CANCER SUFVIV
[2]   HOW ACCURATE ARE SCOTTISH CANCER REGISTRATION DATA [J].
BREWSTER, D ;
CRICHTON, J ;
MUIR, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (05) :954-959
[3]  
BREWSTER D, 1994, ACCURACY 1990 CANCER
[4]  
BYERS TE, 1984, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V72, P1271
[5]   CANCER REGISTRATION BY LINKING PATHOLOGY AND DISTRICT PAS DATA [J].
CODLING, BW ;
PHEBY, D ;
HAGEN, DL ;
DUFFIN, MF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 62 (02) :271-274
[6]   THE INCIDENCES OF LUNG-CANCER AND BREAST-CANCER IN WOMEN IN GLASGOW [J].
GILLIS, CR ;
HOLE, DJ ;
LAMONT, DW ;
GRAHAM, AC ;
RAMAGE, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6865) :1331-1331
[7]   THE RELIABILITY OF CANCER REGISTRY RECORDS [J].
GULLIFORD, MC ;
BELL, J ;
BOURNE, HM ;
PETRUCKEVITCH, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 67 (04) :819-821
[8]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS AND INTERVAL CANCERS - NEEDLES AND HAYSTACKS [J].
KEE, F ;
GORMAN, D ;
ODLINGSMEE, W .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 106 (01) :29-35
[9]  
Kendrick Stephen, 1993, Health Bulletin (Edinburgh), V51, P72
[10]   AN AUDIT OF THE QUALITY OF CANCER REGISTRATION DATA [J].
LAPHAM, R ;
WAUGH, NR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 66 (03) :552-554