RANKING OF WELL-BEING ACCORDING TO URBAN CATEGORIES IN ARGENTINA (2001)

被引:0
作者
Velazquez, Guillermo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Ctr Invest Geog, Campus Univ,Paraje Arroyo Seco 7000 Tandil, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
REVISTA GEOGRAFICA DE AMERICA CENTRAL | 2011年 / 46期
关键词
Geography; well-being; urban hierarchy; population; rankings;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
A very close relationship exists between well-being and urban scale. If we consider a weighted combination of socioeconomic and environmental indicators, we find that bigger middle-sized cities (ATIS in Spanish) of between 400,000 and 1,000,000 inhabitants have the highest level of well-being, followed by middle ATIS, or cities, of 50,000 to 400,000 in population. The largest cities, those with a population of more than 1,000,000 ranked third. However, these differences are better evidenced by crossing urban scale and region. In other words, beyond urban hierarchy as a differentiation factor, the regional context must also be considered to more accurately gage differences in well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 210
页数:26
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Argentina. INDEC, 2002, CENS NAC POBL HOG VI
[2]  
Capua O., 1999, CALIDAD VIDA URBANA, P231
[3]  
CEPEDA R., 2004, 1 SEM ARG GEOGR CUAN
[4]  
CHIOZZA Elena, 1987, TERRITORIO ATLAS TOT
[5]  
DIPACE M, 1992, UTOPIAS MEDIO AMBIEN
[6]  
ESTES Richard, 1993, POBREZA TEMA IMPOSTE, P132
[7]  
FECIC, 1988, DET AMB ARG
[8]  
FORMIGA Nidia, 2003, 6 JORN ARG EST POBL
[9]  
Garcia M., 2001, GEOGRAFIA CALIDAD VI, P64
[10]  
Garnica V., 2005, 2 SEM INT POBL SOC S