INTERFACIAL PH MODULATION OF MEMBRANE-PROTEIN FUNCTION INVIVO - EFFECT OF ANIONIC PHOSPHOLIPIDS

被引:12
|
作者
CALDERON, V [1 ]
CERBON, J [1 ]
机构
[1] INST POLITECN NACL, CTR INVEST & ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS, DEPT BIOCHEM, APARTADO POSTAL 14-740, MEXICO CITY 07000, DF, MEXICO
关键词
MEMBRANE PROTEIN; INTERFACIAL PH; PH; INTERFACIAL; ANIONIC PHOSPHOLIPID;
D O I
10.1016/0005-2736(92)90003-5
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In yeast cells, the magnitude of the membrane surface potential (psi) is determined to a large extent by the relative amount of anionic phospholipids (Cerbon and Calderon (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1028, 261-267). When a significant surface potential exists, the pH at the membrane surface (interfacial pH) will be different to that in the bulk suspending medium. We now report that: (1) In cells with higher psi (phosphatidylinositol-rich cells (PI-rich) and phosphatidylserine-rich cells (PS-rich) a 10-times lower proton concentration in the bulk was enough to achieve thc maximum transport activity of H+-linked transport systems when compared to normal cells. (2) When the psi was reduced by increasing thc concentration of cations in the medium, more protons were required to achieve maximum transport, that is, thc pH activity curves shifted downwards to a more acidic pH. (3) The magnitude of the downward pH shift was around 2.5-times higher for the more charged membranes. (4) Around 10-times more KCl than MgCl2 was necessary to give an equivalent pH shift, in agreement with their capacity to reduce the psi of artificial bilayers. The interfacial pH calculated from the values of psi indicates that it was 0.4 pH units lower in the anionic phospholipid rich cells as compared to normal cells. The results indicate that membrane surface potential may explain the complex relationship between pH, ionic strength and membrane protein function. Maximum transport activities were found for glutamate at interfacial pH of 4.2-4.8 and were inhibited at interfacial pH = 3.2-3.4, suggesting that surface groups of the carrier proteins with pK values in the region 3.8-4.2 (aspartyl and glutamyl) are involved in binding and/or release of charged substrates.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 256
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MODULATION OF MEMBRANE-PROTEIN FUNCTION BY BILAYER LIPIDS
    SMITH, AD
    STUBBS, CD
    BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 82 : 93 - 97
  • [2] KINETICS OF INTERFACIAL ATP ADSORPTION AND ANIONIC-EXCHANGE WITH A SYNAPTIC MEMBRANE-PROTEIN
    HOSS, W
    ABOOD, LG
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 1976, 2 (01) : 71 - 81
  • [3] MODULATION OF MEMBRANE-PROTEIN FUNCTION BY SURFACE-POTENTIAL
    KRAMER, R
    METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, 1989, 171 : 387 - 394
  • [4] Anionic phospholipids are determinants of membrane protein topology
    VanKlompenburg, W
    Nilsson, IM
    VonHeijne, G
    DeKruijff, B
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 65 : PC454 - PC454
  • [5] Anionic phospholipids are determinants of membrane protein topology
    vanKlompenburg, W
    Nilsson, I
    vonHeijne, G
    deKruijff, B
    EMBO JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (14): : 4261 - 4266
  • [6] BIOPHYSICAL INTERACTIONS OF MEMBRANE ANIONIC PHOSPHOLIPIDS WITH PH, CALCIUM AND AUXINS
    LANDAU, EM
    LESHEM, YY
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1988, 39 (209) : 1689 - 1697
  • [7] STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF A VIRAL MEMBRANE-PROTEIN
    KLENK, HD
    GARTEN, W
    ROTT, R
    FRESENIUS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANALYTISCHE CHEMIE, 1984, 317 (06): : 614 - 615
  • [8] ELECTROCONFORMATIONAL COUPLING AND MEMBRANE-PROTEIN FUNCTION
    TSONG, TY
    ASTUMIAN, RD
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1987, 50 (01): : 1 - 45
  • [9] GANGLIOSIDES THAT MODULATE MEMBRANE-PROTEIN FUNCTION
    IGARASHI, Y
    NOJIRI, H
    HANAI, N
    HAKOMORI, SI
    METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, 1989, 179 : 521 - 541
  • [10] Cooperativity in regulation of membrane protein function: phenomenological analysis of the effects of pH and phospholipids
    Zerbetto De Palma, Gerardo
    Recoulat Angelini, Alvaro A.
    Vitali, Victoria
    Gonzalez Flecha, F. Luis.
    Alleva, Karina
    BIOPHYSICAL REVIEWS, 2023, 15 (04) : 721 - 731