Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years

被引:3
作者
Mishra, Shashikant [1 ]
Agrawal, Vikas [1 ]
Khatri, Naushad [1 ]
Sharma, Rajan [1 ]
Kurien, Abraham [1 ]
Ganpule, Arvind [1 ]
Muthu, V. [1 ]
Sabnis, Ravindra B. [1 ]
Desai, Mahesh R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Muljibhai Patel Urol Hosp, Dept Urol, Nadaid, Gujarat, India
关键词
Biochemical recurrence; Indian experience; laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; oncological outcome;
D O I
10.4103/0970-1591.94953
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a lack of published data on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in India. Although the published short-term oncologic outcomes after LRP are encouraging, intermediate and long-term data are lacking. Objective: We analyzed the oncological outcome after LRP based on 6 years of experience and compared it with the other single-center published literature. Materials and Methods: Of the 90 patients who underwent LRP for a clinical T2 localized disease, 73 patients with at least a follow up of one year were analyzed. Patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk DAmico groups in 22 (30%), 26 (36%), and 25 (34%) of the patient population, respectively. Progression of disease was defined as a PSA of 0.4ng/ml with a confirmatory rise. We used Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates to calculate actuarial 5-year probabilities of biochemical progression-free survival. Univariate analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) was done. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.3 6.6 years. The average follow-up for patients was 22 (12-72) months. There was no prostatic cancer-specific mortality. Fourteen patients had BCR. The 5-year progression-free probability for men with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers was 91%, 82%, and 58%, respectively. High-risk group, Gleason sum more than 8, extracapsular extension, and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with biochemical progression. Conclusions: LRP provided a similar level of oncological success as reported by the other contemporary single-center published literature.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 36
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] First danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome
    Vrang, Marie-Louise
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Vainer, Ben
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Gruschy, Lisa
    Brasso, Klaus
    Iversen, Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 46 (03): : 172 - 179
  • [32] The prostate health index PHI predicts oncological outcome and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy - analysis in 437 patients
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Kilic, Ergin
    Matalon, Julia
    Friedersdorff, Frank
    Miller, Kurt
    Jung, Klaus
    Stephan, Carsten
    Busch, Jonas
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (45) : 79279 - 79288
  • [33] Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Drouin, Sarah J.
    Comperat, Eva
    Vaessen, Christophe
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Misrai, Vincent
    Bitker, Marc-Olivier
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel
    Richard, Francois
    Cussenot, Olivier
    Roupret, Morgan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (09) : 1173 - 1178
  • [34] Safety and Efficacy of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-volume Center: A 6-year Single-surgeon Experience
    Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista
    Grande, Pietro
    Mordasini, Livio
    Danuser, Hansjorg
    Mattei, Agostino
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (08) : 4201 - 4207
  • [35] Assessment of Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy According to Preoperative and Postoperative Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Scores: Results from a Large, Two-center Experience
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Zaffuto, Emanuele
    Briganti, Alberto
    Schiffmann, Jonas
    Pompe, Raisa S.
    Tilki, Derya
    Heinzer, Hans
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Budaeus, Lars
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (04): : 568 - 576
  • [36] The predictors of short and long term urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center report in China
    Liu, Lei
    Zhou, Shukui
    Song, Dandan
    Li, Zeng
    Yang, Shengke
    Wu, Yi
    Zhang, Guiying
    Tang, Duocai
    Liu, Junfeng
    Liao, Hong
    Zhang, Chuan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [37] Laparoscopic VS Open Radical Prostatectomy. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Postoperative Outcomes in the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer. A Single-Center Quasi-Experimental Study in Ireland
    Bin Nusrat, Nadeem
    Zafar, Nauman
    Muhammad, Shujah
    Rehman, Assad ur
    Walsh, Kilian
    Durkan, Gareth
    Imtiaz, Saira
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2024, 30 (02): : 130 - 135
  • [38] Oncological outcomes in low-, intermediate- and high D'Amico-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a single UK centre
    Moon, Andrew
    Vasdev, Nikhil
    Veeratterapillay, Rajan
    O'Riordan, Anna
    Durkan, Garrett
    Johnson, Mark
    Soomro, Naeem A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2013, 6 (05) : 295 - 301
  • [39] Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence and Correlation with Various Parameters After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Single Center Experience
    Mahendra Singh
    Sachin Kathuria
    Saurabh Jain
    Shahnawaz Rasool
    Vipin Tyagi
    Manu Gupta
    Mrinal Pahwa
    Himanshu Pandey
    Ajay Sharma
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 13 : 661 - 667
  • [40] Prostate Specific Antigen Density to Predict Prostate Cancer Upgrading in a Contemporary Radical Prostatectomy Series: A Single Center Experience
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Hinz, Stefan
    Hege, Claudia
    Stephan, Carsten
    Jung, Klaus
    Miller, Kurt
    Lein, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) : 126 - 131