Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years

被引:3
作者
Mishra, Shashikant [1 ]
Agrawal, Vikas [1 ]
Khatri, Naushad [1 ]
Sharma, Rajan [1 ]
Kurien, Abraham [1 ]
Ganpule, Arvind [1 ]
Muthu, V. [1 ]
Sabnis, Ravindra B. [1 ]
Desai, Mahesh R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Muljibhai Patel Urol Hosp, Dept Urol, Nadaid, Gujarat, India
关键词
Biochemical recurrence; Indian experience; laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; oncological outcome;
D O I
10.4103/0970-1591.94953
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a lack of published data on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in India. Although the published short-term oncologic outcomes after LRP are encouraging, intermediate and long-term data are lacking. Objective: We analyzed the oncological outcome after LRP based on 6 years of experience and compared it with the other single-center published literature. Materials and Methods: Of the 90 patients who underwent LRP for a clinical T2 localized disease, 73 patients with at least a follow up of one year were analyzed. Patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk DAmico groups in 22 (30%), 26 (36%), and 25 (34%) of the patient population, respectively. Progression of disease was defined as a PSA of 0.4ng/ml with a confirmatory rise. We used Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates to calculate actuarial 5-year probabilities of biochemical progression-free survival. Univariate analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) was done. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.3 6.6 years. The average follow-up for patients was 22 (12-72) months. There was no prostatic cancer-specific mortality. Fourteen patients had BCR. The 5-year progression-free probability for men with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers was 91%, 82%, and 58%, respectively. High-risk group, Gleason sum more than 8, extracapsular extension, and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with biochemical progression. Conclusions: LRP provided a similar level of oncological success as reported by the other contemporary single-center published literature.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 36
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical margin status of specimen and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 400 procedures
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Scarpa, Roberto Mario
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 245 - 250
  • [22] Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience
    Kincius, Marius
    Matjosaitis, Aivaras Jonas
    Trumbeckas, Darius
    Mickevicius, Ramunas
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [23] The efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in the elderly: An oncological outcome analysis
    Harano, Masahiko
    Eto, Masatoshi
    Yokomizo, Akira
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Hamaguchi, Masumitsu
    Naito, Seiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 15 (07) : 577 - 581
  • [24] Single plus one port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of 8 cases in one center
    Gao Yi
    Xu Dan-feng
    Liu Yu-shan
    Cui Xin-gang
    Che Jian-ping
    Yao Ya-cheng
    Yin Lei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (10) : 1580 - 1582
  • [25] Salvage open radical prostatectomy after failed radiation therapy: a single center experience
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    Shah, Galaxy
    Eldefrawy, Ahmed
    Soloway, Mark S.
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) : 144 - 147
  • [26] Oncological long-term outcome of whole gland HIFU and open radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis
    Bernd Rosenhammer
    Roman Ganzer
    Florian Zeman
    Theresa Näger
    Hans-Martin Fritsche
    Andreas Blana
    Maximilian Burger
    Johannes Bründl
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 2073 - 2080
  • [27] Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy—a Single-Center Experience
    Zhi-Hao Chen
    Wen-Hsin Tseng
    Steven K. Huang
    Chien-Liang Liu
    Shun-Hsing Hun
    Jhih-Cheng Wang
    Allen W. Chiu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2023, 85 : 280 - 287
  • [28] Oncological long-term outcome of whole gland HIFU and open radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis
    Rosenhammer, Bernd
    Ganzer, Roman
    Zeman, Florian
    Naeger, Theresa
    Fritsche, Hans-Martin
    Blana, Andreas
    Burger, Maximilian
    Bruendl, Johannes
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (10) : 2073 - 2080
  • [29] Oncological and functional outcomes of a large Canadian robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy database with 10 years of surgical experience
    Tholomier, Come
    Couture, Felix
    Ajib, Khaled
    Preisser, Felix
    Bondarenko, Helen Davis
    Negrean, Cristina
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 9843 - 9851
  • [30] Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy-a Single-Center Experience
    Chen, Zhi-Hao
    Tseng, Wen-Hsin
    Huang, Steven K.
    Liu, Chien-Liang
    Hun, Shun-Hsing
    Wang, Jhih-Cheng
    Chiu, Allen W.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 85 (02) : 280 - 287