E-mentoring for social equity: review of research to inform program development

被引:80
作者
Single, Peg Boyle [1 ]
Single, Richard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
来源
MENTORING & TUTORING | 2005年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/13611260500107481
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The advent of user-friendly email programs and web browsers created possibilities for widespread use of e-mentoring programs. In this review of the research, we presented the history of e-mentoring programs and defined e-mentoring and structured e-mentoring programs, focusing on large-scale e-mentoring programs that addressed issues of social equity and educational advancement. The literature reviewed spanned from the mid-1990s to the present and included journal articles, reports, and book chapters on implemented e-mentoring programs. The literature indicates that ementoring is not a panacea, neither is it an inexpensive alternative to face-to-face mentoring. Ementoring is an alternative mode that facilitates the expansion of mentoring opportunities. The research we reviewed supported that the benefits associated with e-mentoring mirrored the benefits associated with mentoring: informational, psychosocial, and instrumental. In addition, research supports two additional benefits of e-mentoring: the value of impartiality and inter-organizational connections, which were facilitated by the use of electronic communications. Research conducted on the programmatic features associated with e-mentoring programs identified training, coaching, and group e-mentoring as features that enhanced participant involvement. Our goal in providing a review of the research at this stage in the development of e-mentoring was to facilitate increased understanding of the current research to enhance future research and programs and to advance ementoring as a field.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 320
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Asgari M., 2004, AM ED RES ASS SAN DI
[2]  
Bennett D., 1998, CRITICAL ISSUES DESI
[3]  
Bennett D., 1998, BENEFITS ONLINE MENT
[4]  
Bennett D., 1997, BBN NAT SCH NETW C C
[5]  
Bierema L, 2002, INNOVATIVE HIGHER ED, V26, P211, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1017921023103, 10.1023/A:1017921023103]
[6]  
Blaisdell S., 1995, FACTORS UNDERREPRESE
[7]   NEW FACULTY INVOLVEMENT FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES [J].
BOICE, R .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1993, 34 (03) :291-341
[8]  
Boice R., 1990, J STAFF PROGRAM ORG, V8, P143
[9]  
Boyle P., 1998, NEW DIRECTIONS HIGHE, P87
[10]  
Boyle P., 1998, INNOV HIGHER ED, V22, P157, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1025183225886, 10.1023/A:1025183225886]