Cost-effective targeting of riparian buffers to achieve water quality and wildlife habitat benefits

被引:8
作者
Yang, Wanhong [1 ]
Liu, Wenbao [2 ]
Liu, Yongbo [1 ]
Corry, Robert C. [3 ]
Kreutzwiser, Reid D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Geog, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Design & Rural Dev, Guelph, ON, Canada
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; integration; riparian buffers; water quality; wildlife habitats;
D O I
10.1080/15715124.2014.880710
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This study develops an integrated economic, hydrologic, and ecological modelling framework to examine cost-effective targeting of riparian buffers to achieve water quality and wildlife habitat benefits. The framework is empirically applied to the Canagagigue Creek watershed in Ontario, Canada to compare the economic costs for establishing riparian buffers under three alternative environmental and ecological constraints: sediment abatement only, habitat improvement only, and riparian buffer acreage only. The results show that riparian buffers targeted for achieving sediment abatement goal are not effective in improving habitat quality. Similarly, riparian buffers identified through habitat improvement goal achieve less sediment abatement as compared to those targeted in the sediment abatement scenario. The trade-offs suggest that agricultural stewardship programmes with joint water quality and habitat improvement goals may need to allocate funds independently for targeting two pools of riparian buffers: for improving water quality only or for improving habitat only.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 55
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities [J].
Babcock, BA ;
Lakshminarayan, PG ;
Wu, JJ ;
Zilberman, D .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (03) :325-339
[2]   The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: A study of CRP contracts [J].
Babcock, BA ;
Lakshminarayan, PG ;
Wu, JJ ;
Zilberman, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (04) :961-971
[3]  
Bentrup G., 2004, CONSERVATION BUFFERS
[4]  
Boutin C, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P544, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0544:IOAPAE]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure:: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) [J].
Chardon, JP ;
Adriaensen, F ;
Matthysen, E .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2003, 18 (06) :561-573
[7]  
DILLAHA TA, 1989, T ASAE, V32, P513, DOI 10.13031/2013.31033
[8]   Improved indexes for targeting placement of buffers of Hortonian runoff [J].
Dosskey, M. G. ;
Qiu, Z. ;
Helmers, M. J. ;
Eisenhauer, D. E. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2011, 66 (06) :362-372
[9]   COMPARISON OF INDEXES FOR PRIORITIZING PLACEMENT OF WATER QUALITY BUFFERS IN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS [J].
Dosskey, Michael G. ;
Qiu, Zeyuan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2011, 47 (04) :662-671
[10]   Using conservation reserve program maps derived from satellite imagery to characterize landscape structure [J].
Egbert, SL ;
Park, S ;
Price, KP ;
Lee, RY ;
Wu, JP ;
Nellis, AD .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2002, 37 (1-3) :141-156