TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OF ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES TO DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES

被引:0
作者
DUKE, KM [1 ]
CORNABY, BW [1 ]
VELAGALETI, RR [1 ]
机构
[1] BATTELLE MEM INST,505 KING AVE,COLUMBUS,OH 43201
来源
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH | 1994年 / 53卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
More than 50 environmental impact assessment methodologies have been developed and used throughout the world to evaluate the impacts resulting from the construction and operation of a wide diversity of activities. These methods can be classified into five different types: (1) ad hoc, (2) checklist, (3) network, (4) matrix, and (5) overlay-each having strengths and weaknesses. No single type of methodology can meet all the needs for impact assessment of a given human activity. It is, therefore, necessary to synthesize from the available approaches one that will meet the technical, legal, and sociopolitical needs of a particular situation or country. This paper summarizes and illustrates the various types of methods and emphasizes the need to develop an appropriate method pertinent to a particular human activity. It also demonstrates how such methods can be synthesized and implemented in their unique setting from a global perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 618
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BALBACH HE, 1975, ENV IMPACT ANAL CURR
[2]  
CARSON R, SILENT SPRING, P1062
[3]  
CHASE GH, 1976, ENV IMPACT ASSESSMEN
[4]   ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR WATER RESOURCE PLANNING [J].
DEE, N ;
BAKER, J ;
DROBNY, N ;
DUKE, K ;
WHITMAN, I ;
FAHRINGER, D .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1973, 9 (03) :523-535
[5]  
Jain R.K., 1977, ENV IMPACT ANAL NEW
[6]  
Krauskopf T.M., 1972, ENV IMPACT ANAL PHIL
[7]  
Leopold L.B., 1971, 645 US GEOL SURV CIR
[8]  
MCHARG I, 1968, COMPREHENSIVE HIGHWA, V246, P1
[9]  
RIGGINS RE, 1981, J ENVIRON SYST, V10, P81
[10]  
SHOPLEY JB, 1984, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V18, P25