Adaptive Automation Based on an Object-Oriented Task Model: Implementation and Evaluation in a Realistic C2 Environment

被引:28
作者
de Greef, Tjerk E. [1 ]
Arciszewski, Henryk F. R. [2 ]
Neerincx, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] TNO Def, Secur & Safety, Rijswijk, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1518/155534310X522851
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Staffing reduction initiatives and more complicated military operations lead to a higher cognitive workload in command and control (C2) environments. Extending automation with adaptive capabilities can aid the human in overcoming cognitive workload challenges. At present, most adaptive automation research has focused on laboratory experiments and only limited research has aimed to implement and validate adaptive automation in a real-world setting. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of adaptive automation in precisely such a setting, extending the scientific knowledge base of adaptive systems with an evaluation of a real-world adaptive task. Implementing adaptive automation in a real-world C2 setting required extending current adaptive automation theories with an object-oriented task model and a hybrid triggering mechanism. The extended model was evaluated with eight naval officers using a high-fidelity C2 environment and showed an overall efficiency effect of 60%. Furthermore, no negative side effects of adaptive automation have been found, and the data show that the scenarios were manipulated correctly. In addition, the positive efficiency effects appear most strongly in the more complicated asymmetrical scenarios (65%). This latter conclusion shows that adaptive automation can be a valuable contribution to future C2 systems.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 182
页数:31
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE
[2]  
Archer R. D., 1997, P 1 INT C ALL FUNCT, P157
[3]   Adaptive Automation in a Naval Combat Management System [J].
Arciszewski, Henryk F. R. ;
de Greef, Tjerk E. ;
van Delft, Jan H. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2009, 39 (06) :1188-1199
[4]   Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation [J].
Bailey, Nathan R. ;
Scerbo, Mark W. ;
Freeman, Frederick G. ;
Mikulka, Peter J. ;
Scott, Lorissa A. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2006, 48 (04) :693-709
[5]  
Billings C.E., 1994, HUMAN PERFORMANCE AU, P24
[6]  
Billings CE., 1997, AVIATION AUTOMATION
[7]  
Bolderheij F., 2007, MISSION DRIVEN SENSO
[8]   Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment [J].
Bowers, CA ;
Jentsch, F ;
Salas, E ;
Braun, CC .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1998, 40 (04) :672-679
[9]  
Boyd John R., 1987, ORGANIC DESIGN COMMA
[10]   Psychophysiology and adaptive automation [J].
Byrne, EA ;
Parasuraman, R .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 42 (03) :249-268