Minimum Averaged Compliance Density Based Topology Optimization of Structures

被引:5
作者
Liu, Shutian [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Haipeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Delun [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Struct Anal Ind Equipment, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Dept Engn Mech, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
关键词
topology optimization; compliance; base structure;
D O I
10.1163/157361105774537224
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Usually, an optimal topology is obtained by optimizing the material distribution within a prescribed domain; for example, a rectangular domain with a specified length and width for a plane problem. However, the dimensions (i.e. aspect ratio) of a rectangular design domain have significant influence on the resultant optimal topology. In this paper, a minimum Averaged Compliance Density (ACD) based method for topology optimization of structures is proposed. Unlike the conventional topology optimization method, the ACD is taken as the objective function, and the topology and domain dimensions of the structure are optimized simultaneously. As an example, the topology of a cantilever beam with large aspect ratio will be optimized, which is often difficult for traditional topology optimization algorithms. Through optimizing the topology and the dimensions of the design domain, a base structure is obtained, which is repeated to yield the whole, assembled beam. The influence of the relative values of shear force and moment is analyzed numerically. Results show that as the value of the bending moment increases relative to the shear force, the optimal topology changes from a truss-like structure to a vertically stiffened box-like structure.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 142
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
KIKUCHI, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1988, 71 (02) :197-224
[2]   Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization [J].
Bendsoe, MP ;
Sigmund, O .
ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 1999, 69 (9-10) :635-654
[3]  
Bendsoe MP, 1989, STRUCT OPTIMIZATION, V1, P193, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01650949
[4]   Filters in topology optimization [J].
Bourdin, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2001, 50 (09) :2143-2158
[5]   BUBBLE METHOD FOR TOPOLOGY AND SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURES [J].
ESCHENAUER, HA ;
KOBELEV, VV ;
SCHUMACHER, A .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1994, 8 (01) :42-51
[6]  
Eschenauer HA., 2001, APPL MECH REV, V54, P331, DOI [10.1115/1.1388075, DOI 10.1115/1.1388075]
[7]   A review of homogenization and topology optimization III - topology optimization using optimality criteria [J].
Hassani, B ;
Hinton, E .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1998, 69 (06) :739-756
[8]   Optimum topology and reinforcement design of disk and plate structures with multiple stiffness and eigenfrequency objectives [J].
Krog, LA ;
Olhoff, N .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1999, 72 (4-5) :535-563
[9]   A simple checkerboard suppression algorithm for evolutionary structural optimization [J].
Li, Q ;
Steven, GP ;
Xie, YM .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2001, 22 (03) :230-239
[10]   Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) methods [J].
Rietz, A .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2001, 21 (02) :159-163