The Benefits and the Costs of Using Auditory Warning Messages in Dynamic Decision-Making Settings

被引:5
作者
Chamberland, Cindy [1 ,2 ]
Hodgetts, Helen M. [3 ]
Vallieres, Benoit R. [2 ]
Vachon, Francois [4 ]
Tremblay, Sebastien [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Cognit & Social Neurosci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Appl Cognit Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Cardiff Metropolitan Univ, Expt Psychol Human Factors, Sch Appl Psychol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Laval, Sch Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
auditory alarms; change detection; dynamic decision making; decision support system; eye tracking; pupillometry;
D O I
10.1177/1555343417735398
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The failure to notice critical changes in both visual and auditory scenes may have important consequences for performance in complex dynamic environments, especially those related to security, such as aviation, surveillance during major events, and command and control of emergency response. Previous work has shown that a significant number of situation changes remain undetected by operators in such environments. In the current study, we examined the impact of using auditory warning messages to support the detection of critical situation changes and to a broader extent the decision making required by the environment. Twenty-two participants performed a radar operator task involving multiple subtasks while detecting critical task-related events that were cued by a specific type of audio message. Results showed that about 22% of the critical changes remained undetected by participants, a percentage similar to that found in previous work using visual cues to support change detection. However, we found that audio messages tended to bias threat evaluation toward perceiving objects as more threatening than they were in reality. Such findings revealed both benefits and costs associated with using audio messages to support change detection in complex dynamic environments.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 130
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]   Attention aware systems: Theories, applications, and research agenda [J].
Roda, C ;
Thomas, J .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2006, 22 (04) :557-587
[52]   Threat evaluation for impact assessment in situation analysis systems [J].
Roy, J ;
Paradis, S ;
Allouche, M .
SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XI, 2002, 4729 :329-341
[53]   Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events [J].
Simons, DJ ;
Chabris, CF .
PERCEPTION, 1999, 28 (09) :1059-1074
[54]  
St John M., 2005, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4, V49, P473, DOI [10.1177/154193120504900355, DOI 10.1177/154193120504900355, DOI 10.1518/001872005774860014]
[55]  
St John M, 2008, J COGN ENG DECIS MAK, V2, P118, DOI 10.1518/155534308X284381
[56]  
STANTON NA, 1999, HUMAN FACTORS AUDITO, P3
[57]   Pupillary responses and event-related potentials as indices of the orienting reflex [J].
Steiner, Genevieve Z. ;
Barry, Robert J. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (12) :1648-1655
[58]   Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone [J].
Strayer, DL ;
Johnston, WA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (06) :462-466
[59]   FEATURE-INTEGRATION THEORY OF ATTENTION [J].
TREISMAN, AM ;
GELADE, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (01) :97-136
[60]   Nonexplicit Change Detection in Complex Dynamic Settings: What Eye Movements Reveal [J].
Vachon, Francois ;
Vallieres, Benoit R. ;
Jones, Dylan M. ;
Tremblay, Sebastien .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2012, 54 (06) :996-1007