Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages

被引:140
作者
Coenen, Lars [1 ]
Raven, Rob [2 ]
Verbong, Geert [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Innovat Res & Competence Learning Econ CIRCLE, Solvegatan 16, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, POB 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Strategic Niche Management; Geography of innovation; Sustainability transitions; Experiments; Energy storage; The Netherlands;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses how the approach of Strategic Niche Management (SNM) relates to proximity advantages in innovation processes as identified in the geography of innovation literature. The latter claims that the locations where innovation emerge and thrive are not coincidental, but that they follow certain patterns and explanatory logics. Such specific attention for explaining locations is not explicitly present in SNM, although this literature makes claims about the importance of experimentation in local settings, and local and global dynamics. Hence a confrontation of both literatures is thought to be promising. The paper draws on a theoretical discussion and a case study about aquifer thermal energy storage to conclude (1) that there is sufficient evidence for proximity dimensions in niche development; (2) that taking proximity dimensions seriously in SNM helps to unpack processes of upscaling and aggregation; (3) that literature on proximity and innovation can benefit from a more agency-based and dynamic perspective on proximity advantages; and (4) that there is a bias in proximity literature towards advantages of proximity while neglecting potential disadvantages for innovation, aggregation and upscaling. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PATH DEPENDENCE CREA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STICHTING KENNISONTW
[3]  
Asheim B. T., 2000, OXFORD HDB EC GEOGRA, P413
[4]   Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy [J].
Asheim, Bjorn ;
Coenen, Lars ;
Vang, Jan .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2007, 25 (05) :655-670
[5]   Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters [J].
Asheim, BT ;
Coenen, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1173-1190
[6]   The sociology of expectations in science and technology [J].
Borup, Mads ;
Brown, Nik ;
Konrad, Kornelia ;
Van Lente, Harro .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) :285-298
[7]   Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment [J].
Boschma, RA .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) :61-74
[8]   A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects [J].
Brown, N ;
Michael, M .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2003, 15 (01) :3-18
[9]  
Coenen L., 2006, THESIS
[10]  
Cooke P, 1998, ASS EC FIRMS REGIONS