Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians

被引:5
作者
Perilli, Valter [1 ]
Aceto, Paola [1 ]
Sacco, Teresa [1 ]
Martella, Nunzia [1 ]
Cazzato, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Sollazzi, Lilian [1 ]
机构
[1] A Gemelli Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Largo A Gemelli 8, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Digital technique; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway; suction catheter technique; untrained physicians;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5049.126784
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. Methods: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, conducted in the operating setting, 254 patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 18-65 years), undergoing minor surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were body mass index > 35 kg/m(2), laryngeal or oesophageal varices, risk of aspiration or difficult face mask ventilation either referred or suspected (Langeron's criteria >= 2) and modified Mallampati classification score > 2. Participants were randomly allocated to one of the two groups in which PLMA was inserted using DT (DT-group) or SC (SC-group). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test with Yates' correction, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student's t-test were carried-out as appropriate. Results: The final insertion success rate was greater in SC-groupcompared with DT-group 90.1% (n = 109) versus 74.4% (n = 99) respectively (P = 0.002). Mean airway leak pressure was higher in SC-group compared to DT-group (23.7 +/- 3.9 vs. 21.4 +/- 3.2 respectively; (P = 0.001). There were no differences in insertion time, post-operative airway morbidity and complications. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that SC-technique improves the success rate of PLMA insertion by untrained physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings [J].
Aya Fukuhara ;
Ryu Okutani ;
Yutaka Oda .
Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 :1-6
[42]   Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Proseal™ and the LMA-Classic™ in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade [J].
Lardner D.R.R. ;
Cox R.G. ;
Ewen A. ;
Dickinson D. .
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie, 2008, 55 (1) :29-35
[43]   A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Gupta, Roshni ;
Mahajan, Rajesh ;
Jatinder, Mukta ;
Gulati, Smriti ;
Mehta, Anjali ;
Nazir, Robina .
JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (03) :340-347
[44]   Comparative assessment of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway intervention versus standard technique of endotracheal extubation for attenuation of pressor response in controlled hypertensive patients [J].
Singh, Raj Pal ;
Gulabani, Michell ;
Kaur, Mohandeep ;
Sood, Rajesh .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (07) :458-462
[45]   Comparison of weight-based and pinna size-based selection of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in paediatric population - A prospective exploratory trial [J].
Ravi, Ramya ;
Mohan, V. K. ;
Badhe, Ashok Shankar ;
Mishra, Sandeep Kumar ;
Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (01) :36-41
[46]   Comparative evaluation of Air-Q blocker and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial [J].
Jindal, Swati ;
Mittal, Ankita ;
Anand, Lakesh K. ;
Singh, Manpreet ;
Kapoor, Dheeraj .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 65 (13) :S20-S26
[47]   A randomized controlled trial to compare the auricle size-based method for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway selection with the weight-based method among paediatric patients [J].
Jha, Ayush ;
Jacob, Nisha Sara Mundappallil ;
Mathew, Shaji ;
Duggappa, Arun Kumar Handigodu ;
Muhamed, Shiyad ;
Udupi, Sandesh .
TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 37 :50-54
[48]   Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation in lower abdominal gynecological surgeries for perioperative gastric volume assessment and assessing postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal functions: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Mahaseth, Ranjay ;
Gupta, Bhavna ;
Jain, Gaurav ;
Bahadur, Anupama ;
Singla, Deepak ;
Tripathy, Debendra K. .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 19 (01) :27-33