Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians

被引:5
作者
Perilli, Valter [1 ]
Aceto, Paola [1 ]
Sacco, Teresa [1 ]
Martella, Nunzia [1 ]
Cazzato, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Sollazzi, Lilian [1 ]
机构
[1] A Gemelli Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Largo A Gemelli 8, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Digital technique; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway; suction catheter technique; untrained physicians;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5049.126784
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. Methods: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, conducted in the operating setting, 254 patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 18-65 years), undergoing minor surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were body mass index > 35 kg/m(2), laryngeal or oesophageal varices, risk of aspiration or difficult face mask ventilation either referred or suspected (Langeron's criteria >= 2) and modified Mallampati classification score > 2. Participants were randomly allocated to one of the two groups in which PLMA was inserted using DT (DT-group) or SC (SC-group). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test with Yates' correction, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student's t-test were carried-out as appropriate. Results: The final insertion success rate was greater in SC-groupcompared with DT-group 90.1% (n = 109) versus 74.4% (n = 99) respectively (P = 0.002). Mean airway leak pressure was higher in SC-group compared to DT-group (23.7 +/- 3.9 vs. 21.4 +/- 3.2 respectively; (P = 0.001). There were no differences in insertion time, post-operative airway morbidity and complications. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that SC-technique improves the success rate of PLMA insertion by untrained physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   An unusual case of airway rescue in the prone position with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (08) :884-884
[22]   An unusual case of airway rescue in the prone position with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway [J].
Joseph Brimacombe ;
Christian Keller .
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2005, 52 :884-884
[23]   The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy [J].
Lim, Y. ;
Goel, S. ;
Brimacombe, J. R. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2007, 35 (01) :52-56
[24]   Efficacy and Safety Performance of Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Surgery: Experience of 1000 Cases [J].
Sharma, Bimla ;
Sood, Jayashree ;
Sahai, Chand ;
Kumra, Ved Prakash .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 52 (03) :288-296
[25]   Gum elastic bougie-guided placement of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask [J].
Howath, A ;
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Kihara, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2002, 49 (05) :528-529
[26]   The proseal™laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literatureLe masque laryngé ProSeal™: un examen des publications [J].
Tim M. Cook ;
Gene Lee ;
Jerry P. Nolan .
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2005, 52 :739-760
[27]   Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway™ and LMA-ProSeal™ during laparoscopic surgery [J].
Natalini, G ;
Lanza, G ;
Rosano, A ;
Dell'Agnolo, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2003, 15 (06) :428-432
[28]   The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in prone patients: a retrospective audit of 245 patients [J].
Brimacombe, J. R. ;
Wenzel, V. ;
Keller, C. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2007, 35 (02) :222-225
[29]   Effectiveness of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube suction in elective non-laparoscopic surgeries of up to ninety minutes duration: A prospective, randomized study [J].
Verma, Swapnil ;
Sharma, S. P. .
JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 34 (01) :58-61
[30]   Dexmedetomidine with propofol versus fentanyl with propofol for insertion of Proseal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial [J].
Choudhary, Jaya ;
Prabhudesai, Aaditya ;
Datta, Chumki .
JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (03) :368-372