Investor relations level and cost of capital: evidence from Japanese firms

被引:4
作者
Ly, Kosal [1 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Grad Sch Commerce, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Japan; Electronics industry; Investors; Cost of capital;
D O I
10.1108/17574321011028990
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the level of investor relations and cost of capital of Japanese electric appliance firms. Design/methodology/approach - A two-step estimation procedure is used to estimate a regression model of a firm's information asymmetry component of cost of capital on the level of investor relations and other firm characteristics in order to control for self-selection bias. Findings - As expected, a negative link between the level of investor relations and cost of capital is documented after controlling for self-selection bias, firmcharacteristics, and additional robustness check. Research limitations/implications - The result of the paper is based on a sample of listed Japanese electric appliance firms, and thus may not be generalized to other industries or institutional settings. Total spread, which consists of information cost, inventory holding cost, and other processing cost component, might produce measurement errors and thus bias against the results. Further researchers should endeavor to isolate information cost component from total spread. Practical implications - Involving in investor relations' activities to reduce information asymmetries ultimately narrows bid-ask spread, and thus reduces cost of capital. An important implication, therefore, is that managers should treat any market participants equally by communicating to a broad spectrum of investor communities via investor relations. Originality/value - The current paper contributes to the literature by modeling and explicitly controlling for self-selection bias and being the first study to investigate the association between investor relations and cost of capital for Japanese firms.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 104
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ahmed K., 1999, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V31, P35, DOI DOI 10.1006/BARE.1998.0082
[2]   ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :223-249
[3]   LIQUIDITY AND ASSET PRICES - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1988, 17 (01) :5-15
[4]   DIFFERENTIAL INFORMATION AND SECURITY MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BARRY, CB ;
BROWN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1985, 20 (04) :407-422
[5]   Assessing alternative proxies for the expected risk premium [J].
Botosan, CA ;
Plumlee, MA .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2005, 80 (01) :21-53
[6]  
Botosan CA, 1997, ACCOUNT REV, V72, P323
[7]   A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital [J].
Botosan, CA ;
Plumlee, MA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (01) :21-40
[8]  
BOTOSAN CA, 2006, ACCOUNTING BUSINESS, V36, P31, DOI DOI 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730042
[9]   INSIDER HOLDINGS AND PERCEPTIONS OF INFORMATION ASYMMETRY - A NOTE [J].
CHIANG, R ;
VENKATESH, PC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1988, 43 (04) :1041-1048
[10]   EQUILIBRIUM PRICING AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION IN THE PRESENCE OF UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS [J].
COLES, JL ;
LOEWENSTEIN, U .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 22 (02) :279-303