DEFERENCE AND JUDICIAL PRACTICE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENERSA

被引:1
作者
Jordao, Eduardo [1 ]
Cabral Junior, Renato Toledo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] FGV Direito Rio, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro UERJ, Publ, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
REVISTA ESTUDOS INSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES | 2018年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
Regulatory agencies; Judicial review; Deference doctrine; Judicial deference;
D O I
10.21783/rei.v4i2.307
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article is a research product developed by students of Fundacao Getulio Vargas (FGV) Law School in Rio de Janeiro during the second semester of 2017. The main goal of the study was to verify the level of judicial deference of the Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to the decisions taken by AGENERSA, the Independent Regulatory Commission of Energy and Basic Sanitation of the same state. Three different parameters were used: (i) the deference by the discourse; (ii) the deference by the result; and (iii) the deference by the extent of the review. These variables were conjugated to evaluate some trends of the Court in reviewing the decisions of regulatory agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / +
页数:37
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ARAGAO Alexandre Santos de, 2002, AGENCIAS REGULADORAS
[2]  
Barnett K, 2017, MICH LAW REV, V116, P1
[3]  
BINENBOJM Gustavo, 2014, TEORIA DIREITO ADM
[4]  
CARVALHO JD, 2017, MANUAL DIREITO ADM
[5]  
ESKRIDGE JR, 2007, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V96, P1083
[6]  
Jordao E, 2014, ADMIN LAW REV, V66, P1
[7]  
JORDAO Eduardo, 2017, REI REV ESTUDOS I, V3, P180
[8]  
JORDAO Eduardo, 2017, DIREITO ADM ATUALIDA
[9]  
JORDAO Eduardo, 2016, CONTROLE JUDICIAL AD
[10]  
JUSTEN FILHO Marcal, 2011, CURSO DIREITO ADM