Medical liability litigation in Saudi Arabia

被引:10
作者
Al-Saeed, Abdulhamid Hassan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Anaesthesia & Crit Care Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Anaesthet Assoc, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Legal Hlth Org, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Anesthesia; malpractice; medical litigation;
D O I
10.4103/1658-354X.71133
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The author analyzed the anesthesia medical malpractice closed claims that were referred to the Legal Health Organization (LHO) in order to evaluate the magnitude and underlying factors of the problem in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: Annual reports covering the period from 1420H-1429H (1999-2008) were statistically analyzed to give mean figures and percentages in each annual report, and then demonstrated all together to run the differential analysis together with the trend along the studied period. Results: Data analysis showed an escalating trend for the total number of claims over the study period being started with 440 cases on 1420H and ended with 1356 cases by the year 1429H. The annual percentage of the final verdicts of accusation to the total number of claims presented to all committees ranges between 45.5%60.2% with a mean value of 49.9%. Distribution of final verdicts among different clinical specialities showed that obstetrics takes the lead with a mean percentage of 25.5% along the studied period (1420H-1429H), followed by the practice of general surgery with a mean percentage of 13.8%. The sector of health care service showed a significant variation in relation to the mean number of final verdicts with accusation along the studied period, being the highest in the Ministry of Health sector with a mean number of 216.8 claims, followed by the private sector with a mean number of 197.3 claims. Conclusion: Adherence to the standards of medical practice is by far to the best approach to avoid and reduce the incidence of litigation.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   THE PATTERN OF LITIGATION AGAINST ANESTHETISTS [J].
AITKENHEAD, AR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (01) :10-21
[2]   Reviewing medical malpractice cases for a plaintiff's attorney: Heresy or responsibility [J].
Brown, O. William .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (04) :1054-1055
[3]  
Comm Jt. Risk managers physicians, 2010, J QUAL PATIENT SAF, V36, P101
[4]  
Karch Debra L., 2010, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V59, P1
[5]   Permitting Product Liability Litigation for FDA-Approved Drugs and Devices Promotes Patient Safety [J].
Kesselheim, A. S. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 87 (06) :645-647
[6]  
Oliva Jayne, 2005, Physician Exec, V31, P56
[7]   Status of medical liability claims in Saudi Arabia [J].
Samarkandi, Abdulhamid .
ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2006, 26 (02) :87-91
[8]   PITFALLS IN ANESTHETIC PRACTICE [J].
UTTING, JE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (07) :877-890