Electronic Resources and Heterodox Economics

被引：2

作者：

D'Orlando, Fabio ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cassino, Dipartimento Sci Econ, Campus Folcara,Via Angelo, I-03043 Cassino, FR, Italy

[2] Univ Cassino, Creat & Motivat Econ Ctr CREAM, Cassino, Italy

来源：

REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY | 2013年 / 25卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/09538259.2012.729941

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

The idea of measuring scientific relevance by counting citations is gaining influence among economists, and thanks to the electronic bibliographic resources now available the procedure has become relatively simple and fast. However, when it comes to putting the idea into practice many problems emerge. This paper uses four of the principal bibliographic electronic resources (EconLit, JSTOR, Web of Science and Scopus) to test the practical applicability of this method to the case of the five theoretical schools classified as 'Current Heterodox Approaches' in JEL code B5.

引用

页码：399 / 425

页数：27

共 15 条

[1]

Adler R., 2008, CITATION STAT REPORT

[2]

Amin M., 2000, IMPACT FACTORS USE A, V1, P2

[3]

[Anonymous], 2005, SCI IMPACT QUANTITY

[4]

Archambault ?., 2004, USE BIBLIOMETRICS SO

[5]

BUTLER L, 2006, RQF PILOT STUDY PROJ

[6]

Harzing A.W., 2008, GOOGLE SCHOLAR NEW D

[7]

Hicks Diana, 2006, ECON POLIT-ITALY, V23, P145, DOI [10.1428/22461, DOI 10.1428/22461]

[8]

Mahdi S., 2008, CITATION COUNTS ARE

[9] Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar [J].

Meho, Lokman I. ;

Yang, Kiduk .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (13) :2105-2125

[10]

Nelson R., 1982, EVOL THEOR

← 1 2 →