Comparison of Non Enhanced Computed Tomography with Ultrasound in Patients with Renal Colic

被引:1
作者
Cakiroglu, Basri [1 ]
Eyupoglu, S. Erkan [2 ]
Hazar, A. Ismet [3 ]
Balci, M. B. Can [3 ]
Sinanoglu, Orhun [4 ]
Aksoy, Suleyman Hilmi [5 ]
机构
[1] Hisar Intercontinental Hosp, Urol Klin, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Amasya Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Urol Klin, Amasya, Turkey
[3] Taksim Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Urol Klin, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Maltepe Univ, Tip Fak, Urol Anabilim Dali, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Hisar Intercontinental Hosp, Radyol Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MEDICINE-JAREM | 2013年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Non enhanced computed tomography; ultrasound; ureteral stone; renal colic;
D O I
10.5152/jarem.2013.10
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of non enhanced computed tomography (NECT) with ultrasound (US) imaging in the assessment of ureteral stone in patients admitted to emergency department with flank pain. Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2012, the data of patients admitted to the urology outpatient clinic or emergency department with uni or bilateral flank and/or groin pain were included in the study. The data of US, NECT and urinanalysis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients whose stones were not detected on US examination and refered to NECT examination were included in the study. Results: The mean age and stone size of the 138 patients included in the study were 35.3 +/- 10.8 (7-68), 6.12 +/- 2.68 (3-17), respectively. The patients were distributed according to stone size; the mean age, stone size of 63 patients in group I and group II were 33.1 +/- 10.7, 3.93 +/- 0.98 mm and 37.1 +/- 10.9, 7.96 +/- 2.24 mm respectively. NECT, US sensitivities in Group 1 and Group 2 were 96% (72/75), 56% (76) and 97% (63), 56% (76). The patients were also distributed according to stone location in the urinary tract; the mean age and stone size of 47 patients in group A (kidney stones) were 36.0 +/- 9.47, 5.52 +/- 0.3 mm respectively. the mean age and stone size of 23 patients in group B (renal pelvis and upper ureteral stones) were 38.10 +/- 11.1 and 7.87 +/- 1.98 mm, the mean age and stone size of 25 patients in C group (mid ureteral Stones) were 34.5 +/- 10.2 and 6.02 +/- 1.33 mm, the mean age and stone size of 43 patients in D group (lower ureteral stones) were 33.4 +/- 11.9 and 5.86 +/- 2.33 mm, respectively. Conclusion: NECT is more efficient than US in the detection urinary stones in patients admitted to the emergency department. However, the non invasive US on bedside examination in the emergency department can be useful in the detection of urinary stones. Computed tomography can be useful in cases with negative stone findings in US.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Epitaph for the urogram [J].
Amis, ES .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (03) :639-640
[2]   CT for the evaluation of flank pain [J].
Anderson, KR ;
Smith, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) :25-29
[3]   Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths [J].
Bell, TV ;
Fenlon, HM ;
Davison, BD ;
Ahari, HK ;
Hussain, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) :363-367
[4]   Recurrent renal stone disease - advances in pathogenesis and clinical management [J].
Bihl, G ;
Meyers, A .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9282) :651-656
[5]   Ureterolithiasis: Value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT [J].
Boridy, IC ;
Nikolaidis, P ;
Kawashima, A ;
Goldman, SM ;
Sandler, CM .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (03) :619-621
[6]   Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients [J].
Boulay, I ;
Holtz, P ;
Foley, WD ;
White, B ;
Begun, FP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1485-1490
[7]  
Boyd R, 1996, J ACCID EMERG MED, V13, P390
[8]   Suspected ureteral colic: Primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography [J].
Catalano, O ;
Nunziata, A ;
Altei, F ;
Siani, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) :379-387
[9]   Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic - is the radiation dose justifiable? [J].
Denton, ERE ;
Mackenzie, A ;
Greenwell, T ;
Popert, R ;
Rankin, SC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (07) :444-447
[10]   Acute ureterolithiasis: Incidence of secondary signs on unenhanced helical CT and influence on patient management [J].
Ege, G ;
Akman, H ;
Kuzucu, K ;
Yildiz, S .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (12) :990-994