GENETIC EVALUATION OF ON-FARM TESTED PIGS USING AN ANIMAL-MODEL .2. PREDICTION OF BREEDING VALUES WITH A MULTIPLE TRAIT MODEL

被引:13
作者
HOFER, A
HAGGER, C
KUNZI, N
机构
[1] Institute of Animal Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
来源
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE | 1992年 / 30卷 / 1-2期
关键词
PIGS; GENETIC EVALUATION; ANIMAL MODEL; BREEDING VALUE;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-6226(05)80022-3
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the application of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) with a multiple trait animal model for the genetic evaluation of on-farm tested pigs. The analysis was based on test results of 197 949 Yorkshire (Y) and 70 550 Landrace (L) pigs tested in Switzerland from 1976 to 1987. The two traits considered were average daily gain (ADG) and premium cuts in proportion to carcass weight (PCP) estimated from ultrasonic measurements. The model contained fixed herd x year x season, sex, unknown parent group effects and the linear regression on live weight, as well as random litter and animal effects. The mixed model equations with 582 698 (Y) and 211 768 (L) unknowns were solved by 'iteration on the data'. Inbreeding was taken into account. The average inbreeding coefficient of parents born in 1986 was 1% and 1.5% in the Y and L breed, respectively. On the supercomputer CRAY X-MP/28 all the data were kept in memory. The computing time (CPU time) required for one round of iteration was 2.5 (Y) and 0.9 (L) seconds. 100 rounds of iteration were sufficient for the estimation of genetic trend. In both traits genetic trend was positive for both breeds. During the 12 years considered, ADG improved genetically by 6.5 g/day and 10.3 g/day, and PCP by 1.9% and 1.2% in the Y and L breed respectively. The effect of ignoring inbreeding on predicted breeding values was small.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 98
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MULTIVARIATE STAT AN
[2]   COMPARISON OF AN ANIMAL-MODEL AND AN EQUIVALENT REDUCED ANIMAL-MODEL FOR COMPUTATIONAL-EFFICIENCY USING MIXED MODEL METHODOLOGY [J].
BLAIR, HT ;
POLLAK, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1984, 58 (05) :1090-1096
[3]  
BLUM JK, 1982, KLEINVIEHZUCHTER, V30, P1314
[4]  
BLUM JK, 1983, THESIS ETH ZURICH
[5]  
CHESNAIS JP, 1988, 3RD P WORLD C SHEEP, P219
[6]  
CHRISTIANI DC, 1986, AM J IND MED, V10, P143
[7]   SIMPLE METHOD FOR COMPUTING INVERSE OF A NUMERATOR RELATIONSHIP MATRIX USED IN PREDICTION OF BREEDING VALUES [J].
HENDERSON, CR .
BIOMETRICS, 1976, 32 (01) :69-83
[8]   COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE SIRE EVALUATION METHODS [J].
HENDERSON, CR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1975, 41 (03) :760-770
[9]  
Henderson CR, 1988, J DAIRY SCI, V71, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0022-0302(88)79974-9
[10]   GENETIC EVALUATION OF ON-FARM TESTED PIGS USING AN ANIMAL-MODEL .1. ESTIMATION OF VARIANCE-COMPONENTS WITH RESTRICTED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD [J].
HOFER, A ;
HAGGER, C ;
KUNZI, N .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1992, 30 (1-2) :69-82