Patient Involvement and Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care

被引:36
作者
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Marien [3 ]
Perez-Ramos, Jeanette [3 ]
Rivero-Santana, Amado [3 ]
Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Evaluat Unit Canary Isl Hlth Serv SESCS, Tenerife, Spain
[2] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Tenerife, Spain
[3] Canary Isl Fdn Hlth & Res FUNCIS, Tenerife, Spain
来源
CURRENT CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2011年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
Mental health; patient decision aids; patient involvement; patient participation; patient-provider relationship; shared decision-making;
D O I
10.2174/157488411796151192
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
There is growing interest in shared decision-making (SDM) in which the provider and patient go through each phase of the decision-making process together, share treatment preferences, and reach an agreement on treatment choice. Although a majority of the research evaluating SDM has been conducted under "physical" health conditions, patients' participation and SDM for mental health conditions has received increasing interest since the mid-1990s. SDM in mental health care can be more complex than in general health care because that several patient characteristics, health care provider, and system level factors may hinder normalization and implementation of this model into clinical practice. To date, in comparison with other health problems, there are few studies which have assessed SDM in this context. In spite of that, evidence points favorably towards the inclusion of SDM in mental health treatment decisions, given that the majority of patients with mental illness prefer to be involved in the process and wish to have information. However, more studies are needed to provide evidence about the impact of SDM on treatment compliance and health care outcomes. In this overview, the authors present the current state and the future perspectives of SDM in mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness [J].
Adams, Jared R. ;
Drake, Robert E. ;
Wolford, George L. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (09) :1219-1221
[2]   Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice [J].
Adams, JR ;
Drake, RE .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2006, 42 (01) :87-105
[3]   Psychiatric advance directives and the role of autonomy [J].
Ambrosini, Daniel L. ;
Crocker, Anne G. .
SANTE MENTALE AU QUEBEC, 2009, 34 (02) :51-74
[4]   Impact of decisional capacity on the use of leverage to encourage treatment adherence [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. ;
Redlich, Allison .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2006, 42 (02) :121-130
[5]   Assessing effectiveness of treatment of depression in primary care - Partially randomised preference trial [J].
Bedi, N ;
Chilvers, C ;
Churchill, R ;
Dewey, M ;
Duggan, C ;
Fielding, K ;
Gretton, V ;
Miller, P ;
Harrison, G ;
Lee, A ;
Williams, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 177 :312-318
[6]   The Emerging Importance and Relevance of Shared Decision Making to Clinical Practice [J].
Braddock, Clarence H., III .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 :5S-7S
[7]  
Bunn MH, 1997, ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, V11, P238
[8]   LAY PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH-CARE DECISION-MAKING - A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK [J].
CHARLES, C ;
DEMAIO, S .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 1993, 18 (04) :881-904
[9]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[10]   Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making [J].
Charles, Cathy ;
Gafni, Amiram ;
Whelan, Tim ;
O'Brien, Mary Ann .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (03) :262-267