REAPPRAISAL OF SAFETY OF ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES IN THE ELDERLY

被引:23
作者
DEENITCHIN, GP
KONOMI, H
KIMURA, H
OGAWA, Y
NARITOMI, G
CHIJIIWA, K
TANAKA, M
IKEDA, S
机构
[1] KYUSHU UNIV,FAC MED,DEPT SURG 1,FUKUOKA 812,JAPAN
[2] FUKUOKA UNIV,SCH MED,FUKUOKA 81401,JAPAN
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80251-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is the method of choice for elderly patients with common bile duct stones, even though these patients are poor operative risks, We undertook this study to analyze the operative risk factors for this age group, METHODS: We compared specific problems of 182 patients aged 80 years or older and 921 younger patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. RESULTS: Despite a higher frequency of periampullary diverticula in the elderly than in the younger patients (54% versus 36%, P <0.001), the success rates of sphincterotomy were not different, The elderly patients required lithotripsy more often than did the younger ones (15% versus 4%, P <0.001), and the necessity of stenting or nasobiliary drainage was greater in this group (9%) than in the younger group (5%, P <0.05), This difference in the tactics between the older and younger groups was due to the greater number and size of stones, longer period of time for complete clearance of the common bile duct (13.5 versus 6.0 days, P <0.01), and a greater percentage of patients with operative risks (55% versus 36%, P <0.001). The elderly also had significantly greater overall morbidity compared with the younger patients (13% versus 7%, P <0.005), frequency of acute cholangitis (8% versus 2%, P <0.001), and mortality (1% versus O%), CONCLUSION: These results suggest that frequent stenting or nasobiliary drainage to prevent cholangitis or prompt stone removal by lithotripsy would be necessary in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 54
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT CALCULI IN PATIENTS WITHOUT STONES IN THE GALLBLADDER
    BENATTAR, JM
    CAROLIBOSC, FX
    HARRIS, AG
    DUMAS, R
    DELMONT, J
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1993, 38 (12) : 2225 - 2227
  • [22] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES SHOULD NOT BE OVER UTILIZED
    MIENY, CJ
    LAAGE, NJ
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 72 (01): : 64 - 64
  • [23] ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    PONSKY, JL
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 16 (06) : 1060 - 1065
  • [24] ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    KOZAREK, RA
    SANOWSKI, RA
    ARIZONA MEDICINE, 1980, 37 (09) : 625 - 627
  • [25] ERCP AND ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN WITH JAUNDICE DUE TO COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    GUELRUD, M
    MENDOZA, S
    JAEN, D
    PLAZ, J
    MACHUCA, J
    TORRES, P
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1992, 38 (04) : 450 - 453
  • [26] ENDOSCOPIC PROSTHESIS FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    DIAS, LM
    CAIRNS, SR
    SALMON, PR
    COTTON, PB
    GUT, 1987, 28 (10) : A1371 - A1371
  • [27] ENDOSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    LUX, G
    RIEMANN, JF
    SCHEUBEL, R
    HOCHBERGER, J
    FORTSCHRITTE DER MEDIZIN, 1985, 103 (38) : 888 - 892
  • [28] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY AND BILIARY DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH CHOLANGITIS DUE TO COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    BOENDER, J
    NIX, GAJJ
    DERIDDER, MAJ
    DEES, J
    SCHUTTE, HE
    VANBUUREN, HR
    VANBLANKENSTEIN, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 90 (02) : 233 - 238
  • [29] THE MANAGEMENT OF GIANT BILE-DUCT STONES AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY
    VANDERMEEREN, A
    DELHAYE, M
    CREMER, M
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 104 (04) : A380 - A380
  • [30] ENDOSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    BETHGE, N
    HINTZE, RE
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1987, 25 (02): : 119 - 123